A black life that still doesn’t matter – to Obama administration

On Oct. 3, 2013, a 34-year-old unarmed black mother, Miriam Carey, was shot dead by U.S. Capitol Police in Washington, D.C.

miriam-carey-niagara-falls-600

But there were no cries of racism from the civil-rights community.

There were no brash denunciations of the police from the likes of Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson.

There were no protesters marching in the streets.

Just a coverup by YOUR government.

by Paul Bremmer

WASHINGTON – On Oct. 3, 2013, a 34-year-old unarmed black mother and dental assistant with no criminal record, Miriam Carey, was shot dead by U.S. Capitol Police in Washington, D.C. in her own car with her child still in the car seat.

But there were no cries of racism from the civil-rights community.

There were no brash denunciations of the police from the likes of Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson.

There were no protesters marching in the streets.

The national media breifly reported the story and then moved on within about 24 hours.

However, Garth Kant, Washington bureau chief, did not move on.

He spent months digging into the story and eventually discovered it had been widely mischaracterized in the media. He lays out all his findings in the brand-new book “Capitol Crime: Washington’s Cover-up of the Killing of Miriam Carey.”

“Remember how they called for civil-rights violation investigations in Ferguson and with Trayvon [Martin]?” Kant asked host Susan Knowles on a recent episode of “Stand for Truth Radio.” “In Ferguson they sent, what was it, 500 FBI investigators and launched their own federal investigation. Of course it came up with nothing, and the only thing they could say was, well, there’s still troubles in the department; that’s why it needs their help of federal guidelines and they need to reform their department, even though the officer did nothing wrong.

“In the case of Miriam Carey, [Eric] Sanders, the [Carey family] lawyer, has tried on more than one occasion to first get Eric Holder and then Loretta Lynch to look into this for possible civil-rights violations, and he has never gotten a word back from them.”

Nor did the ACLU show interest in standing up for Carey’s civil liberties. Kant said no one from the organization was available to comment on the Carey case when he called them.

The unfortunate thing is Kant’s reporting has revealed Miriam Carey was less deserving of her fate than higher-profile black victims such as Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, yet she garnered less national sympathy than they did.

Kant became involved in this case because he happened to be working near the scene of Miriam Carey’s fateful confrontation that day. He was sitting in the cafeteria of the Third District federal courthouse finishing up a story when all of a sudden “it seemed like every police car in the world just streamed by in front of the window and then headed up Constitution [Ave.], so it was obvious there was something major going on,” he told Knowles.

A quick Internet search told Kant there had been shots fired on Capitol Hill. So he packed up his things and headed outside, walking about two blocks to reach the police line, where a crowd was already gathering. He saw a mangled police cruiser sitting in the road. However, none of the officers on the scene had any information on what had happened.

Kant managed to find two witnesses who said they had seen police chase a black car around Garfield Circle, which is directly in front of the U.S. Capitol, before the car headed up Constitution Ave.

After a couple hours, police held a press conference near the scene of the crash and offered more information.

“When the police came out, they told us that somebody had tried to breach security at the White House, that they had rammed the barricade, that they weren’t sure yet, but they think shots might have been fired at the White House, the suspect fled, led cops on a high-speed chase,” Kant relayed. “None of that turned out to be true, but that was the story that everybody reported that day.”  All lies.

Kant’s subsequent research revealed a clearer picture of how Miriam Carey ended up dead in her car in the streets of Washington that day. Carey, who lived in Stamford, Connecticut, had a couple days off from work and decided to strap her 13-month-old daughter into the back seat of her car and take off for Washington, D.C. She didn’t tell her mother, sisters or any of her coworkers what she was doing.

Carey had never done anything like this before, although she had been treated for post-partum depression. This led to widespread speculation that she must have been crazy, but Kant reported her symptoms had long since gone away and her family, friends and coworkers all said she seemed normal.

There was no sign of an argument or any incident that may have caused her to take a long drive. Her family and friends didn’t have the slightest inkling anything was wrong with Carey; she seemed happy with her life and her career.

When Carey arrived in D.C., she drove up to a guarded White House entrance, but the guards on duty did not seem to notice her. The first thing she did, according to Kant, was make a U-turn around the guard post to try and leave, which suggested she had turned into the entrance by accident.

The guards, however, tried to stop her from leaving, which is illegal. An off-duty Secret Service agent who happened to be walking by saw the commotion and dragged a metal gate in front of Carey’s car to try and stop her. She tried to drive around it, but the officer dragged it in front of her again. He never identified himself to Carey as a Secret Service agent and he was in plain clothes.

As Carey tried to maneuver around the barrier, she tapped the edge of the gate, and it swung around and knocked the agent down, according to the police report Kant viewed.

“Then, according to witnesses at the scene, rather than fleeing, as police have said and as the U.S. attorney and Department of Justice have maintained… the first thing she did was stop at a red light,” Kant told Knowles. “Then she proceeded normally into traffic.”

The U.S. attorney’s report said Carey then led officers on a high-speed chase of 60 to 80 mph. However, Kant noted it took Carey four minutes to get from the White House to the Capitol, meaning she could have only been traveling about 20 mph. Kant also examined traffic camera video of the moments Carey would have been racing down Pennsylvania Ave. toward the Capitol, but he saw no high-speed chase.

“So it appears she didn’t try to breach security, she did not ram a gate, she did not run over an officer, she did not flee, and she did not lead them on a high-speed chase,” Kant concluded.

When Carey got to Garfield Circle, she drove around the circle and stopped facing the Capitol. Several police vehicles pulled up around Carey’s care, but they did not block her in.

“What happened there is perhaps the most inexplicable part, because they surrounded her with guns drawn and were ordering her to stop, and why she didn’t stop nobody knows, and that can only be a matter of conjecture,” Kant said. “I’ve got to suspect it was panic. You can only imagine she didn’t know what was going on.”

At any rate, Carey drove onto the sidewalk to escape the officers. For reasons unknown, according to Kant, they shot at her. This was in a heavily trafficked area with many pedestrians; it was near a parking lot, a Metro station and the Rayburn House Office Building and a thirteen month old child in the car.

Kant noted there had been a mass shooting at Washington’s Navy Yard only two weeks earlier, so D.C. police were most likely still on edge. Eric Sanders, the Carey family’s attorney, believes the officers panicked and were incompetently trained, according to Kant.

“I think the best educated guess was that it was a combination of miscommunication, incompetence and overzealousness,” Kant offered.

Hers was the black life that didn’t matter.

Police fired eight bullets at Carey’s car, but she drove up Constitution Ave. toward the Capitol. She ran into a pop-up Capitol Police barricade outside the Hart Senate Office Building. Kant noted the police were on shaky legal footing here.

“It violates the Secret Service and Capitol Police policies on vehicle pursuits,” he said. “You’re only supposed to arrest a suspected felon, and you’re not supposed to endanger the public. The public had already had shots fired in its direction. A Capitol Police cruiser had already hit one of the pop-up barriers and he had to be airlifted to the hospital. It was already a dangerous situation. She wasn’t accused of any felonies; she wasn’t even accused of crimes. Reckless driving was all they could cite.”

At the pop-up barrier, Carey backed up and tried to drive over a median to escape. A police cruiser boxed her in from the front, and she tried to back up. That’s when an officer in front of her and another one from her side unleashed a hail of bullets. Every shot that hit Carey hit her in the back or side, including the one that struck her head and killed her.

According to Kant, none of the five witnesses who saw the fatal shooting said Carey was driving at any officers or threatening them in any way. The officer who shot Carey from behind said he shot because he feared for his life. However, Kant pointed out the fatal shot came in from the side, so the officer would not have been in danger of being run over when he shot Carey.

Kant stressed police had no prior knowledge of Miriam Carey before this incident. She wasn’t a terrorist, she wasn’t part of any larger criminal organization, and she was not a wanted woman. She was just an ordinary suburban mother. When a local newspaper entered her license plate number into a criminal database, nothing came up on her.

And yet, there was no national outcry over the slaughter of this unarmed black woman who did not appear to threaten police officers. The nascent Black Lives Matter movement did not protest Carey’s death. Kant contacted representatives of both Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and explained his findings on the case. Both representatives said the Carey case sounded interesting and asked for more information. Kant sent them more information, but he never heard back from either.

“The only thing I can think is that with the other black people in the news who have been shot by officers, those shootings were all local police,” Kant surmised. “These were federal officials. These were Obama’s Secret Service and the U.S. Capitol Police.”

Susan Knowles, the host, deduced Sharpton’s cozy relationship with the Obama administration probably prevented him from denouncing two federal law enforcement agencies, including one that works directly for the executive branch.

“I can see with Al Sharpton, with his relationship with this administration, I can see why he doesn’t want to make waves, and that’s probably why he didn’t follow up on it,” Knowles said. “It wasn’t a state he could go in and get money from, which is what he does.”

Kant agreed: “The racial bias narrative doesn’t work in this instance, because then you’d be accusing Obama’s government of racial bias.”

Kant noted one ironic element of this case.

“In the wake of incidents like Ferguson and Trayvon Martin and Eric Garner… the call has been for a standardization of police standards nationally, based on the federal model,” he noted. “And the problem for those advocates with Miriam Carey is if this is an example of federal policing, how is it that we want this taught nationwide? Because what happened to her seems to be a prime case of overzealousness and/or incompetence, because it just wasn’t handled well.”

Kant said he is now trying to obtain a 92-page memo containing findings and conclusions of the Justice Department on the Miriam Carey case. This memo, which Kant called “the holy grail of this case,” would contain the reasons why they chose not to file criminal charges against the officers.

When Kant considers how Secret Service agents did not shoot an armed intruder who jumped the White House fence and ran into the White House, the cops’ reaction to the unarmed Miriam Carey seems far too harsh.

“What they should have done, and I think they know it, is just let her go,” the author proclaimed.

Kant noted Carey was never accused of any crimes. When the police got a search warrant to search her apartment after they killed her, the only crime they cited was a statute they said was assault on an officer, but in reality was simply assault. The Carey family attorney told Kant they likely did that because they knew they could not credibly accuse her of assaulting an officer.

“So the whole thing was just very shady and dubious, and honestly, I think they know they screwed up royally, and that’s why they clamped down on it.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council Announces First-Ever Presidential Endorsement In Its History

Unprecedented…and it’s not who you think

Early Monday morning, the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council made a huge announcement that rocked the political world.

“We hereby endorse Donald J. Trump, and urge all Americans, especially the millions of lawful immigrants living within our country, to support Donald J. Trump, and to protect American jobs, wages and lives,” the organization’s president, Chris Crane, wrote in a statement published at DonaldJTrump.com.

What made the endorsement so stunning was that the National ICE Council had never before in its history made an endorsement for a candidate running for an elected office.

Plus, the council represented 7,600 federal immigration officers and law enforcement support staff members.

Yet this time around, the council chose to have a vote, and according to the results of that vote, GOP candidate Donald Trump received the vast majority of the council members’ support.

“This first-ever endorsement was conducted by a vote of our membership, with Hillary Clinton receiving only 5 percent of that vote,” Crane’s statement clarified.

In explaining why council members disliked Democrat candidate Clinton so much, Crane pointed to her support of “the most radical immigration proposal in U.S. history.”

He also claimed that her plan had been crafted with the assistance of “special interests and open-borders radicals.”

“Her radical plan would result in the loss of thousands of innocent American lives, mass victimization and death for many attempting to immigrate to the United States, the total gutting of interior enforcement, the handcuffing of ICE officers, and an uncontrollable flood of illegal immigrants across U.S. borders,” his statement went on.

The Democrat candidate would also expand executive amnesty, expand catch-and-release and prioritize the non-enforcement of America’s federal immigration laws, Crane wrote.

Trump’s plan, on the other hand, would “restore immigration security” by, among other things, cancelling President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty, putting an end to sanctuary cities and providing immigration agents with the tools and resources they need to effectively carry out their jobs.

“America has been lied to about every aspect of immigration in the United States,” Crane continued.

“We can fix our broken immigration system, and we can do it in a way that honors America’s legacy as a land of immigrants, but Donald Trump is the only candidate who is willing to put politics aside so that we can achieve that goal,” he concluded.

National ICE Council Announces First-Ever Presidential Endorsement In Its History

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

DHS RUSHING CITIZENSHIP APPLICATIONS TO SWAY ELECTION

Your Department of Homeland Insecurity is approving as many naturalization cases as quickly as possible to give Hillary a win.

The Homeland Security Department is granting as many citizenship applications as it can to try to sway participation in this year’s presidential election, an internal department document shows.

An email obtained by Senate Republicans shows a Texas immigration office demanded volunteers to work weekends, hoping to get as many people onto the citizenship rolls as possible before the end of September — which would give them enough time to register to vote in November.

Democrats and immigration groups had launched a drive to try to get eligible immigrants to become citizens in time to vote for Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. The advocates had a goal of registering 1 million citizens and they have created a massive backlog that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is now working through.

The memo from a branch chief at the USCIS Houston field office said in the July memo that the goal was to get as many applications approved as possible “due to the election year.”

Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, chairmen of two committees with oversight of the Homeland Security Department, demanded answers from Secretary Jeh Johnson.

“Your department seems intent on approving as many naturalization cases as quickly as possible at a time when it should instead be putting on the brakes and reviewing past adjudications,” the two Republicans said in a letter.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/22/homeland-security-trying-rush-citizenship-applicat/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Who Is Behind The Riots? Liberal Billionaire George Soros

70% Of Arrested “Protesters” Were Bussed In From Out Of State, Funded By Soros

640x0

Liberal Billionaire George Soros is buying the 2016 election

Confirming what many had suspected when viewing the sudden and intense collapse into anarchy that occurred in Charlotte this week, Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told CNN’s Erin Burnett:

“This is not Charlotte that’s out here. These are outside entities that are coming in and causing these problems. These are not protestors, these are criminals.”

“We’ve got the instigators that are coming in from the outside. They were coming in on buses from out of state. If you go back and look at some of the arrests that were made last night. I can about say probably 70% of those had out-of-state IDs. They’re not coming from Charlotte.” They are not even coming from North Carolina.

As shocking as this statement is, it should not be a total surprise. 18 months ago, as the riots flared in Ferguson, there was one man pulling the strings of this ‘domestic false flag’… Liberal King, George Soros.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-17/mysterious-sponsor-behind-ferguson-protests-and-media-campaign-george-soros

In an apparent effort to “keep the media’s attention on the city and to widen the scope of the incident to focus on interrelated causes — not just the over policing and racial discrimination narratives that were highlighted by the news media in August,” liberal billionaire George Soros donated $33 million to “social justice” organizations which helped turn events in Ferguson from a local protest into a national flashpoint.

As The Washington Times explains,

There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets.

Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with MoveOn.org.

Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the U.S., according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times.

Still not buying it? As The New American recently reported, Ken Zimmerman, the director of U.S. programs at Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF), denied last year that Soros had funded BLM, saying it was just a rumor.

That was before hackers with DCLeaks.com published OSF documents showing that the Soros group had already given at least $650,000 directly to BLM and more indirectly.

Those same documents reveal the reason for OSF bankrolling BLM: the “dismantling” of America so that it can be recast according to the vision of Soros and his leftist cohorts for personal gain.

The communist-on-its-face nature of these and other demands of the organizations under the BLM umbrella are a clear indicator of the real intent of BLM. The deep-pocketed funding by the likes of Soros, the Center for American Progress, the Ford Foundation, and Borealis Philanthropy show that BLM is the means, not the end.

BLM is little more than a tool of social revolutionaries hell-bent on destroying America so they can build their long awaited dystopia which they attempt to pass off as a utopia.

So with Hillary’s poll numbers decling rapidly, and a debate looming that she would desperately like to be focused on domestic division as opposed to every email, pay-to-play, foreign policy misstep, and cough or stumble she has taken; is anyone shocked that ‘out of state’ protesters would turn up in Charlotte suddenly turning a peaceful but angry protest into tear-gas-filled deadly riots?

And who is a big donor to Clinton?

 

George Soros: $7 million

Financier George Soros founded what would become the Quantum Fund in 1969 with $12 million. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, he’s now worth $24.7 billion and continues to invest through Soros Fund Management, a family firm. As a political donor, Soros has been mercurial. In 2004, he contributed $23.5 million to organizations opposing George W. Bush’s reelection effort. In 2008, he donated $2,300 to both Clinton and Barack Obama, and that was it. Soros’s Open Society Policy Center, the advocacy arm of his philanthropic network, spent $8.2 million on lobbying Washington in 2015. It focuses on international human rights, immigration, foreign aid, public health and criminal justice reform, among other issues. Since 2003, Soros has contributed $54 million to federal candidates and committees.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-22/who-behind-riots-charlotte-police-says-70-arrested-protesters-had-out-state-ids

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hillary Has Serious Health Issues

http://media.thehill.com/services/player/bcpid407451912001?bctid=5137262974001&bckey=AQ~~,AAAAAEA-5AE~,7pYsU79IKz1jyZLSY9Sb290m5ARebDo_

Hillary Has Serious Health Issues

By John R. Coppedge, MD, FACS is a general surgeon from Texas, originally posted on The Hill

Hillary Clinton exhibited abnormal eye movements during her recent speech in Philadelphia and they were not photoshopped.

Her eyes did not always move in the same direction at the same time. It appears that she has a problem with her left sixth cranial nerve. That nerve serves only one function and that is to make the lateral rectus muscle contract. That muscle turns the eye in the direction away from the midline.

It comes out of the base of the brain and runs along the floor of the skull, immediately beneath the brain before coursing upward to the eye. Dysfunction of that muscle causes the striking picture of the eyes not aiming in the same direction and causes the patient to suffer double vision.

Like all things medical, there is a long list of potential causes but in my opinion the most likely one, based on Clinton’s known medical history is an intermittent lateral rectus palsy caused by damage to or pressure on her sixth cranial nerve.

It is known that she suffered a traumatic brain injury in late 2012 when she fell and struck her head. What is also known is that she was diagnosed with a transverse sinus thrombosis — blood clot in the major vein at the base of the brain. Almost all patients with a transverse sinus thrombosis suffer swelling of the brain and increased intracranial pressure. Most have headaches, balance issues and visual disturbances — all of which Clinton was reported to have following that event.

Clinton’s physician reported that she was placed on Coumadin (a blood thinner) to dissolve the blood clot. Actually, that is incorrect, because Coumadin has no effect on an existing clot. It serves only to decrease the chance of further clotting occurring Clinton’s physician has also reported that on follow up exam, the clot had resolved. That is surprising since the majority of such clots do not dissolve. The way it was documented that the clot had resolved has not been reported.

If, as is statistically likely, Clinton’s transverse sinus is still blocked, she would still have increased pressure and swelling and decreased blood flow to her brain. That swelling would place pressure on the exposed portion of the sixth cranial nerve at the base of her brain, explaining the apparent lateral rectus palsy. And such a deficit can be partial and/or intermittent.

Additionally, when patients who have decreased intracranial blood flow becoming volume depleted (dehydrated) or have a drop in blood pressure loss of consciousness can occur. That could explain her witnessed collapse in New York City on 9/11.

One thing that is taught early in medical school is that a patient’s history, physical exam, signs and symptoms should usually lead to a single diagnosis.

Crudely put “when you itch, it is probably not lice and fleas but one or the other.” More professionally put, in most cases the patient’s symptoms can be explained by one unifying diagnosis, not a constellation of disparate ones. The admittedly speculative scenario I propose is an attempt to understand and rationally explain what is going on, based on known facts and the observable signs exhibited by Clinton.

Having previously written about this, I once again suggest that she undergo an independent neurologic exam and have proper studies to determine whether or not she still has a blood clot at the base of her brain, swelling of the brain, increased intracranial pressure and whether or not her 2012 traumatic brain injury was accompanied by a skull fracture with or without bleeding around or in the brain itself and if there are any residual areas of scarring of the brain.

Critics will rightly point out that I have not examined Clinton. They will point out that I am not ophthalmologist or a neurologist. But I am a physician and the concepts discussed above are taught to every medical student early in their education. Her traumatic brain injury, transverse sinus thrombosis, subsequent symptoms, falling, passing out and now the obvious problem with eye movement are all fact, not speculation.

It would be very helpful if Clinton agreed to an independent exam and to have the questions raised here answered. It is too important not to get this right.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hillary Screams “Why Aren’t I 50 Points Ahead” In The Polls?

Notice they now have her staring directly at cameras so viewers can’t see the eye tracking issue when she looks to the side…

hillary-clinton-eyes-unfocused-drudge-600
Shocked that after spending 10s of millions of dollars, she remains only modestly ahead in the polls, Hillary Clinton exclaimed during an teleconference with the Laborers’ International Union of North America, saying, “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?”

The surprised look on Hillary’s face says it all…

20160922_clinton50This is not a normal looking or acting person.

Donald Trump was quick offer a three word reason… “because you’re terrible!”

20160919_trumpads_0
Hillary Clinton has spent about 40 to 50 times what Donald Trump has spent to air television ads in key states. That will likely continue; in a new count by Advertising Age, the Clinton campaign and its allied super PACs have booked $145.3 million in ad time between now and Election Day, to $4.4 million for Trump and his groups.

“Because she’s terrible.  I mean, she’s had a terrible record. Everything she touches is bad. You look at what’s going on with Libya and you look at the surge and you look at all of her decisions and you look at the Iran deal, which is one of the dumbest deals I’ve ever seen, which she started, and she totally backs, by the way, I mean, in its completed form, she totally backs. You look at everything she touched, I mean, it’s just a mess. And she’s spending a lot of money and so far it’s not had much of an impact because I guess I’m winning in most of these states and we’ll see what happens in the end, but she is terrible.” Donald Trump

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Fake Hillary Rally or Is Hillary A Vampire?

The 1997 movie Wag the Dog satirically explored how politics and journalism can work together to mislead and influence the American public.

Art imitates life

I has been proven all summer that Hillary’s rallies have been manipulated and photoshopped to show crowds in the thousands when the actual number in attendance was closer to a hundred.

But surely there are limits to what the press might attempt, right? Photoshopping a ghost-town rally is one thing, but…staging an entire rally for Hillary? Would the press really dare?

The answer seems to be yes.

Hillary’s first public appearance after her 9/11 collapse in New York was at a rally in Greensboro, NC, on September 15. Obviously, Hillary would need to make a strong appearance in order to silence the growing doubts about her health. We know that Hillary does not react well to loud and unpredictable crowds. So the best way to ensure a strong appearance by Hillary after her astonishing seizure and collapse would be to create the ideal conditions for her to deliver her speech. An auditorium with hundreds of supporters is too unpredictable. A much more ideal setting would be a posh boardroom… or a cozy cafe… or better yet, a film studio.

As crazy as it may sound, there are some very troubling pieces of evidence that indicate the press may have literally staged Hillary’s return rally to strengthen their odds of winning.  Let’s look at them one by one.

First, as soon as Hillary enters, things look odd. As many online have noted, the upraised hands and phones look a lot like CGI insertions.

Second, the behavior of many people in the crowd seems very odd.

greensboro-fake-rally-phone-cameras-4chan-600w

Who you gonna believe–the press or your own lyin’ eyes?

Third, during her speech the news cameras never once pan out to show the venue or size of the crowd. So it’s hard to know just how large the venue or crowd was as it was being filmed live. Footage shown after the fact is harder to trust.

Fourth, at around 17:12 in her speech Hillary makes a “joke” followed by what sounds like a dubbed-in laugh track dubbed that abruptly cuts off. Notice that, when the crowd “laughs” at her “joke,” Clinton doesn’t even pause or acknowledge the laughter. She just rushes right into her next “line.”

Listen close to the audio track. Laugh track abruptly stops…#FAKE pic.twitter.com/qyGKNhx7wi

— Francis Dominicus (@francisdominicu) September 17, 2016

It’s like they’re not even trying to hide it at this point…

And then near the end of her speech something happens that has caused the most debate online:

Hillary disappears.

A frame-by-frame analysis of the video shows that Hillary and her podium disappear.

This was not a case of transmission lag, however, since the red and white background remains and displays no distortion of compression problems at all. You can visualize it this way:

The live footage of the building in Greensboro (red and white) did not glitch, but the hypothetical footage of Hillary and her podium in front of a greenscreen do glitch.

Greenscreening a rally might seem outrage, but keep in mind that Obama greenscreened at least one speech of his own.

I can’t say that I endorse every idea in this film, but it is worth pondering.

Fifth is the disappearing balcony people…

A sixth piece of evidence to consider is that, in 2015 the Clinton campaign explicitly endorsed the idea of using holographic technology to allow Hillary to appear at more than one location at once.

Hillary Has Done Some Questionable Things, But THIS? Hardly A “Rally”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment