DHS RUSHING CITIZENSHIP APPLICATIONS TO SWAY ELECTION

Your Department of Homeland Insecurity is approving as many naturalization cases as quickly as possible to give Hillary a win.

The Homeland Security Department is granting as many citizenship applications as it can to try to sway participation in this year’s presidential election, an internal department document shows.

An email obtained by Senate Republicans shows a Texas immigration office demanded volunteers to work weekends, hoping to get as many people onto the citizenship rolls as possible before the end of September — which would give them enough time to register to vote in November.

Democrats and immigration groups had launched a drive to try to get eligible immigrants to become citizens in time to vote for Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. The advocates had a goal of registering 1 million citizens and they have created a massive backlog that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is now working through.

The memo from a branch chief at the USCIS Houston field office said in the July memo that the goal was to get as many applications approved as possible “due to the election year.”

Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, chairmen of two committees with oversight of the Homeland Security Department, demanded answers from Secretary Jeh Johnson.

“Your department seems intent on approving as many naturalization cases as quickly as possible at a time when it should instead be putting on the brakes and reviewing past adjudications,” the two Republicans said in a letter.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/22/homeland-security-trying-rush-citizenship-applicat/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Who Is Behind The Riots? Liberal Billionaire George Soros

70% Of Arrested “Protesters” Were Bussed In From Out Of State, Funded By Soros

640x0

Liberal Billionaire George Soros is buying the 2016 election

Confirming what many had suspected when viewing the sudden and intense collapse into anarchy that occurred in Charlotte this week, Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told CNN’s Erin Burnett:

“This is not Charlotte that’s out here. These are outside entities that are coming in and causing these problems. These are not protestors, these are criminals.”

“We’ve got the instigators that are coming in from the outside. They were coming in on buses from out of state. If you go back and look at some of the arrests that were made last night. I can about say probably 70% of those had out-of-state IDs. They’re not coming from Charlotte.” They are not even coming from North Carolina.

As shocking as this statement is, it should not be a total surprise. 18 months ago, as the riots flared in Ferguson, there was one man pulling the strings of this ‘domestic false flag’… Liberal King, George Soros.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-17/mysterious-sponsor-behind-ferguson-protests-and-media-campaign-george-soros

In an apparent effort to “keep the media’s attention on the city and to widen the scope of the incident to focus on interrelated causes — not just the over policing and racial discrimination narratives that were highlighted by the news media in August,” liberal billionaire George Soros donated $33 million to “social justice” organizations which helped turn events in Ferguson from a local protest into a national flashpoint.

As The Washington Times explains,

There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets.

Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with MoveOn.org.

Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the U.S., according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times.

Still not buying it? As The New American recently reported, Ken Zimmerman, the director of U.S. programs at Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF), denied last year that Soros had funded BLM, saying it was just a rumor.

That was before hackers with DCLeaks.com published OSF documents showing that the Soros group had already given at least $650,000 directly to BLM and more indirectly.

Those same documents reveal the reason for OSF bankrolling BLM: the “dismantling” of America so that it can be recast according to the vision of Soros and his leftist cohorts for personal gain.

The communist-on-its-face nature of these and other demands of the organizations under the BLM umbrella are a clear indicator of the real intent of BLM. The deep-pocketed funding by the likes of Soros, the Center for American Progress, the Ford Foundation, and Borealis Philanthropy show that BLM is the means, not the end.

BLM is little more than a tool of social revolutionaries hell-bent on destroying America so they can build their long awaited dystopia which they attempt to pass off as a utopia.

So with Hillary’s poll numbers decling rapidly, and a debate looming that she would desperately like to be focused on domestic division as opposed to every email, pay-to-play, foreign policy misstep, and cough or stumble she has taken; is anyone shocked that ‘out of state’ protesters would turn up in Charlotte suddenly turning a peaceful but angry protest into tear-gas-filled deadly riots?

And who is a big donor to Clinton?

 

George Soros: $7 million

Financier George Soros founded what would become the Quantum Fund in 1969 with $12 million. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, he’s now worth $24.7 billion and continues to invest through Soros Fund Management, a family firm. As a political donor, Soros has been mercurial. In 2004, he contributed $23.5 million to organizations opposing George W. Bush’s reelection effort. In 2008, he donated $2,300 to both Clinton and Barack Obama, and that was it. Soros’s Open Society Policy Center, the advocacy arm of his philanthropic network, spent $8.2 million on lobbying Washington in 2015. It focuses on international human rights, immigration, foreign aid, public health and criminal justice reform, among other issues. Since 2003, Soros has contributed $54 million to federal candidates and committees.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-22/who-behind-riots-charlotte-police-says-70-arrested-protesters-had-out-state-ids

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hillary Has Serious Health Issues

http://media.thehill.com/services/player/bcpid407451912001?bctid=5137262974001&bckey=AQ~~,AAAAAEA-5AE~,7pYsU79IKz1jyZLSY9Sb290m5ARebDo_

Hillary Has Serious Health Issues

By John R. Coppedge, MD, FACS is a general surgeon from Texas, originally posted on The Hill

Hillary Clinton exhibited abnormal eye movements during her recent speech in Philadelphia and they were not photoshopped.

Her eyes did not always move in the same direction at the same time. It appears that she has a problem with her left sixth cranial nerve. That nerve serves only one function and that is to make the lateral rectus muscle contract. That muscle turns the eye in the direction away from the midline.

It comes out of the base of the brain and runs along the floor of the skull, immediately beneath the brain before coursing upward to the eye. Dysfunction of that muscle causes the striking picture of the eyes not aiming in the same direction and causes the patient to suffer double vision.

Like all things medical, there is a long list of potential causes but in my opinion the most likely one, based on Clinton’s known medical history is an intermittent lateral rectus palsy caused by damage to or pressure on her sixth cranial nerve.

It is known that she suffered a traumatic brain injury in late 2012 when she fell and struck her head. What is also known is that she was diagnosed with a transverse sinus thrombosis — blood clot in the major vein at the base of the brain. Almost all patients with a transverse sinus thrombosis suffer swelling of the brain and increased intracranial pressure. Most have headaches, balance issues and visual disturbances — all of which Clinton was reported to have following that event.

Clinton’s physician reported that she was placed on Coumadin (a blood thinner) to dissolve the blood clot. Actually, that is incorrect, because Coumadin has no effect on an existing clot. It serves only to decrease the chance of further clotting occurring Clinton’s physician has also reported that on follow up exam, the clot had resolved. That is surprising since the majority of such clots do not dissolve. The way it was documented that the clot had resolved has not been reported.

If, as is statistically likely, Clinton’s transverse sinus is still blocked, she would still have increased pressure and swelling and decreased blood flow to her brain. That swelling would place pressure on the exposed portion of the sixth cranial nerve at the base of her brain, explaining the apparent lateral rectus palsy. And such a deficit can be partial and/or intermittent.

Additionally, when patients who have decreased intracranial blood flow becoming volume depleted (dehydrated) or have a drop in blood pressure loss of consciousness can occur. That could explain her witnessed collapse in New York City on 9/11.

One thing that is taught early in medical school is that a patient’s history, physical exam, signs and symptoms should usually lead to a single diagnosis.

Crudely put “when you itch, it is probably not lice and fleas but one or the other.” More professionally put, in most cases the patient’s symptoms can be explained by one unifying diagnosis, not a constellation of disparate ones. The admittedly speculative scenario I propose is an attempt to understand and rationally explain what is going on, based on known facts and the observable signs exhibited by Clinton.

Having previously written about this, I once again suggest that she undergo an independent neurologic exam and have proper studies to determine whether or not she still has a blood clot at the base of her brain, swelling of the brain, increased intracranial pressure and whether or not her 2012 traumatic brain injury was accompanied by a skull fracture with or without bleeding around or in the brain itself and if there are any residual areas of scarring of the brain.

Critics will rightly point out that I have not examined Clinton. They will point out that I am not ophthalmologist or a neurologist. But I am a physician and the concepts discussed above are taught to every medical student early in their education. Her traumatic brain injury, transverse sinus thrombosis, subsequent symptoms, falling, passing out and now the obvious problem with eye movement are all fact, not speculation.

It would be very helpful if Clinton agreed to an independent exam and to have the questions raised here answered. It is too important not to get this right.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hillary Screams “Why Aren’t I 50 Points Ahead” In The Polls?

Notice they now have her staring directly at cameras so viewers can’t see the eye tracking issue when she looks to the side…

hillary-clinton-eyes-unfocused-drudge-600
Shocked that after spending 10s of millions of dollars, she remains only modestly ahead in the polls, Hillary Clinton exclaimed during an teleconference with the Laborers’ International Union of North America, saying, “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?”

The surprised look on Hillary’s face says it all…

20160922_clinton50This is not a normal looking or acting person.

Donald Trump was quick offer a three word reason… “because you’re terrible!”

20160919_trumpads_0
Hillary Clinton has spent about 40 to 50 times what Donald Trump has spent to air television ads in key states. That will likely continue; in a new count by Advertising Age, the Clinton campaign and its allied super PACs have booked $145.3 million in ad time between now and Election Day, to $4.4 million for Trump and his groups.

“Because she’s terrible.  I mean, she’s had a terrible record. Everything she touches is bad. You look at what’s going on with Libya and you look at the surge and you look at all of her decisions and you look at the Iran deal, which is one of the dumbest deals I’ve ever seen, which she started, and she totally backs, by the way, I mean, in its completed form, she totally backs. You look at everything she touched, I mean, it’s just a mess. And she’s spending a lot of money and so far it’s not had much of an impact because I guess I’m winning in most of these states and we’ll see what happens in the end, but she is terrible.” Donald Trump

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Fake Hillary Rally or Is Hillary A Vampire?

The 1997 movie Wag the Dog satirically explored how politics and journalism can work together to mislead and influence the American public.

Art imitates life

I has been proven all summer that Hillary’s rallies have been manipulated and photoshopped to show crowds in the thousands when the actual number in attendance was closer to a hundred.

But surely there are limits to what the press might attempt, right? Photoshopping a ghost-town rally is one thing, but…staging an entire rally for Hillary? Would the press really dare?

The answer seems to be yes.

Hillary’s first public appearance after her 9/11 collapse in New York was at a rally in Greensboro, NC, on September 15. Obviously, Hillary would need to make a strong appearance in order to silence the growing doubts about her health. We know that Hillary does not react well to loud and unpredictable crowds. So the best way to ensure a strong appearance by Hillary after her astonishing seizure and collapse would be to create the ideal conditions for her to deliver her speech. An auditorium with hundreds of supporters is too unpredictable. A much more ideal setting would be a posh boardroom… or a cozy cafe… or better yet, a film studio.

As crazy as it may sound, there are some very troubling pieces of evidence that indicate the press may have literally staged Hillary’s return rally to strengthen their odds of winning.  Let’s look at them one by one.

First, as soon as Hillary enters, things look odd. As many online have noted, the upraised hands and phones look a lot like CGI insertions.

Second, the behavior of many people in the crowd seems very odd.

greensboro-fake-rally-phone-cameras-4chan-600w

Who you gonna believe–the press or your own lyin’ eyes?

Third, during her speech the news cameras never once pan out to show the venue or size of the crowd. So it’s hard to know just how large the venue or crowd was as it was being filmed live. Footage shown after the fact is harder to trust.

Fourth, at around 17:12 in her speech Hillary makes a “joke” followed by what sounds like a dubbed-in laugh track dubbed that abruptly cuts off. Notice that, when the crowd “laughs” at her “joke,” Clinton doesn’t even pause or acknowledge the laughter. She just rushes right into her next “line.”

Listen close to the audio track. Laugh track abruptly stops…#FAKE pic.twitter.com/qyGKNhx7wi

— Francis Dominicus (@francisdominicu) September 17, 2016

It’s like they’re not even trying to hide it at this point…

And then near the end of her speech something happens that has caused the most debate online:

Hillary disappears.

A frame-by-frame analysis of the video shows that Hillary and her podium disappear.

This was not a case of transmission lag, however, since the red and white background remains and displays no distortion of compression problems at all. You can visualize it this way:

The live footage of the building in Greensboro (red and white) did not glitch, but the hypothetical footage of Hillary and her podium in front of a greenscreen do glitch.

Greenscreening a rally might seem outrage, but keep in mind that Obama greenscreened at least one speech of his own.

I can’t say that I endorse every idea in this film, but it is worth pondering.

Fifth is the disappearing balcony people…

A sixth piece of evidence to consider is that, in 2015 the Clinton campaign explicitly endorsed the idea of using holographic technology to allow Hillary to appear at more than one location at once.

Hillary Has Done Some Questionable Things, But THIS? Hardly A “Rally”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Tim Kaine butchers the Bible

Dr. Michael Brown (www.askdrbrown.org) is the host of the nationally syndicated “Line of Fire” radio program.

Self Proclaimed “Devout” Roman Catholic Tim Kaine Butchers the Bible and Embraces Gay Radicalism

48974583-cached

Speaking at the Human Rights Campaign’s annual Washington, D.C., dinner, Democratic vice-presidential nominee Tim Kaine butchered the Bible and made one of the most twisted arguments for same-sex “marriage” you’ll ever hear. Yet the very article laying out his arguments described him as a “devout” Roman Catholic. How can this be?

28-tim-kaine-mascara-w529-h352

Putting aside the obvious question of how Kaine could serve on a presidential ticket with the radically pro-abortion candidate Hillary Clinton – indeed, he has already been challenged for “saying he is both a ‘traditional Catholic’ and a strong supporter of abortion” – Kaine raised further eyebrows when suggesting that the Catholic Church could one day change its position on same-sex “marriage,” just as he has done.

In support of his viewpoint, he cited Pope Francis’ oft-quoted comment about gay Catholics (“Who am I to judge?”), failing to realize that the pope was not sanctioning homosexual acts and relationships but rather saying, “If someone is same-sex attracted and wants to be part of the Church, who am I to judge?”

This is very different from saying, “If two men are in love and want to have a romantic and sexual relationship, who am I to judge?”

But I am not a Catholic, nor can I predict where the Roman Catholic Church will be in five or 50 years.

What I can say with certainty is that Sen. Kaine’s use of Genesis 1 to buttress his support of LGBT activism amounts to scriptural malpractice.

He said, “I think it’s going to change because my church also teaches me about a creator who, in the first chapter of Genesis, surveyed the entire world, including mankind, and said, ‘It is very good.’”

And, he added, “Who am I to challenge God for the beautiful diversity of the human family? I think we’re supposed to celebrate it, not challenge it.”

Seriously? Kaine is going to Genesis 1 to argue for same-sex “marriage,” along with the larger LGBT agenda?

Allow me to give a helpful hint to the senator: Sir, although you will find no support for your position anywhere in the Bible, the worst place you can go to argue your case is Genesis.

The culture war is not over! Gain hope, courage and practical advice in Michael Brown’s latest book, “Outlasting the Gay Revolution: Where Homosexual Activism Is Really Going and How to Turn the Tide”

It is in Genesis 1 that we see the importance of gender distinctions, as God creates humankind as male and female – not as male, female and an infinite number of variations, including agender, bigender, and third gender, along with multi-gender options like ambigender, bigender, blurgender, collgender, conflictgender, cosmicgender, crystagender, deliciagender, duragender, demiflux, domgender, fissgender, gemelgender, gendercluster, genderfluid, gendersea, genderfuzz, genderfractal, genderspiral, genderswirl, gendervex, gyaragender, libragender, ogligender, pangender, polygender and trigender.

Is this what Kaine was referring when he spoke of “the beautiful diversity of the human family” that we should celebrate?

Genesis 1 states the exact opposite.

It is also in Genesis 1 that God blesses His human creation with the words, “be fruitful and multiply,” and it is only heterosexuals, by design, who can do this. That’s why, to this moment, no homosexual couple has ever been blessed by God with the ability to procreate by themselves.

This sets the pattern for the rest of the Bible, where the only marital relationships blessed by God, without exception, are heterosexual, with the male and female being uniquely designed for one another biologically, emotionally and spiritually.

Accordingly, it is based on Genesis 1 that Paul explains in Romans 1 that homosexual acts are contrary to nature – meaning, contrary to God’s intended, natural plan for men and women.

And it is based on Genesis 1 that Jesus explains in Matthew 19 that marriage, as intended by God from the beginning, is the lifelong union of a man and a woman.

Does Sen. Kaine now have insight into Genesis 1 that not only escaped his own Catholic Church, but Jesus and Paul as well?

As for Kaine’s argument that when the Creator “surveyed the entire world, including mankind [He] said, ‘It is very good’” – meaning that homosexuality and bisexuality and more are all good – he seems to have forgotten that “very good” was God’s description of His creation before the fall, when sin entered the world.

After the fall, His assessment changed dramatically to this: “The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually” (Genesis 6:5).

So much for the “very good” assessment applying to human nature today!

As expressed by Jesus, “what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a person. For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander” (Matthew 15:18-19).

And note carefully that the Greek word for sexual immorality, porneia, is used in the plural here, referring to all sexual acts outside of marriage, which Jesus defined as the union of one man and one woman (see Matthew 19:4-6).

So, the very thing Sen. Kaine wants to celebrate, the very “diversity” he claims God established in creation, is the precise opposite of what God intended for His creation, as stated clearly in Genesis 1 and reaffirmed throughout the rest of the Bible, from Moses to Jesus to Paul.

Mrs. Clinton’s running mate would do well to submit his thinking to the Scriptures rather than twisting the Scriptures to fit his thinking.

It is the senator who must change, not the Word of God.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Supreme Court give blacks the OK to flee cops anytime they feel racially profiled

Massachusetts Supremes give blacks green light to flee cops, but whites must obey cops

15894743-thief-criminal-running-in-silhouette-studio-isolated-on-white-background-in-silhouette-studio-isolat-stock-photo

In a decision certain to influence the debate over police interactions with black suspects, the Massachusetts Supreme Court dismissed the gun conviction of a black man arrested by Boston police, ruling his fleeing from officers can be considered legitimate given black males’ fear of being racially profiled.

Jimmy Warren was arrested Dec. 18, 2011, by police who were investigating a break-in in nearby Roxbury. According to the victim, the suspects were three black men, one of whom was wearing a red hoodie, another a black hoodie and the third non-descript dark clothing. Warren was latter spotted with a second man, both wearing dark clothing, by officers.

Both men fled when approached by an officer seeking to question them. When Warren was later apprehended, he was accused of possession of an unlicensed .22-caliber pistol that police said he threw away during pursuit. While no items from the burglary were found in his possession, he was charged and convicted of unlawful possession of the weapon. Warren appealed.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court based it’s decision to overturn the conviction on two arguments. The witness description of the suspected burglars was too vague, the judges ruled, and there was no cause to question the pair just because they fit the “ubiquitous” clothing description or because the officer had a “hunch,” reported WBUR News.

“Lacking any information about facial features, hairstyles, skin tone, height, weight, or other physical characteristics, the victim’s description ‘contribute[d] nothing to the officers’ ability to distinguish the defendant from any other black male’ wearing dark clothes and a ‘hoodie’ in Roxbury,” the decision read.

Secondly, the court cited an American Civil Liberties Report charging the Boston Police Department with “a pattern of racial profiling of black males” to say blacks who flee police are not necessarily indicating guilt but may be reasonably seeking to avoid the “indignity” of discrimination.

According to the ACLU report, 63 percent of interactions between Boston police and civilians between 2007 and 2010 were with blacks, even though they accounted for just 24 percent of the population.

The judges wrote: “We do not eliminate flight as a factor in the reasonable suspicion analysis whenever a black male is the subject of an investigatory stop. However, in such circumstances, flight is not necessarily probative of a suspect’s state of mind or consciousness of guilt. Rather, the finding that black males in Boston are disproportionately and repeatedly targeted for FIO [Field Interrogation and Observation] encounters suggests a reason for flight totally unrelated to consciousness of guilt. Such an individual, when approached by the police, might just as easily be motivated by the desire to avoid the recurring indignity of being racially profiled as by the desire to hide criminal activity. Given this reality for black males in the city of Boston, a judge should, in appropriate cases, consider the report’s findings in weighing flight as a factor in the reasonable suspicion calculus.”

Massachusetts law does not require citizens to talk to police or to not walk away if they are not being charged.

“The War on Police: How the Ferguson effect is making America Unsafe” is a cop’s-eye view of one of the most tumultuous times in recent history for law enforcement.

The decision was hailed by the ACLU of Massachusetts as a “powerful ruling” confirming “for people of color … their lives matter.”

“The reason that’s significant is that all the time in police-civilian encounters there are disputes about what is suspicious and what is not suspicious,” said Matthew Segal, legal director of the ACLU of Massachusetts. “So this is an opinion that looks at those encounters through the eyes of a black man who might justifiably be concerned that he will be the victim of profiling.”

That view was not shared by Boston Police Commissioner Bill Evans, who criticized the court for depending so heavily on an ACLU report that was “clearly way out of context” and “heavily tainted against the police department.”

Retired federal Judge Nancy Gertner told Radio Boston the court’s decision will “contribute substantially to the national debate” by forcing courts to “put in context” reasons black defendants might legitimately flee, and to not automatically view running from police as evidence of guilt.

Accusing police of frequently “pushing the envelope” to “see what this kid will do,” Gertner laid the blame for much of the problem between police and black citizens on law enforcement who will now need to adapt to the decision or risk having evidence they want to obtain ruled inadmissible.

“Maybe it will force officers to pause before they begin one of these encounters, understanding what the atmosphere is. … Police will just have to develop other investigative tools,” she said.

Gertner was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in 1993 by President Bill Clinton and served until 2011. She is currently a professor at Harvard Law School.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/massachusetts-supremes-give-blacks-green-light-to-flee-cops/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment