CNN Fires Dr. Drew One Week After He Voiced “Grave Concern” For Hillary’s Health

One week ago, board-certified medicine specialist, TV personality and CNN employee Dr. Drew Pinsky broke the mold of Clinton News Network propaganda conformity, when he said that he is “gravely concerned” about presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s health, pointing out that treatment she is receiving could be the result of her bizarre behaviors.

bahar-1-600x338Appearing on KABC’s McIntyre in the Morning, Pinsky said he and his colleague Dr. Robert Huizenga became “gravely concerned….not just about her health but her health care,” after analyzing what medical records on Hillary had been released. Pinsky pointed out that after Clinton fainted and fell in late 2012, she suffered from a “transverse sinus thrombosis,” an “exceedingly rare clot” that “virtually guarantees somebody has something wrong with their coagulation system.” “What’s wrong with her coagulation system, has that been evaluated?” asked Dr. Drew.

Pinsky described the situation as “bizarre,” and said that Hillary’s medical condition was “dangerous” and “concerning”. Dr. Drew also went on to add that it was a sign of “brain damage” when Hillary had to wear prism glasses after her fall.

Just as stunning as Dr. Drew’s honest assessment which promptly went viral and led to the immediate takedown of the original interview webpage by KABC-AM radio, was that it came from an employee of HLN, which is part of the pro-Clinton CNN network.

As such it is probably not surprising that earlier today, just one week later, CNN executive vice president Ken Jautz announced Thursday that “Dr. Drew and I have mutually agreed to air the final episode of his show on September 22.”

“Dr. Drew and his team have delivered more than five years of creative shows and I want to thank them for their hard work and distinctive programming,” Jautz said in a statement. “Their audience-driven shows, in particular, were innovative and memorable TV. And Dr. Drew has been an authoritative voice on addiction and on many other topical issues facing America today.”

There was no mention of the Hillary fiasco in the official parting statement; it was deemed redundant.

HLN will air reruns of “Forensic Files” and episodes of CNN originals in the “Dr. Drew” 7 p.m. ET time slot.

Some of the comments:

His body will be found in a zipped up duffle bag and it will be rulled a suicide

Nothing strange about this at all…all coincidence of course

He’s just lucky he didn’t fall asleep on rail road tracks in Arkansas.

Dr. Drew meet nailgun…. suicide of course..

His wife reported she’s hiding all the nail guns in their house

Death by two rifle shot to back of head is rule as suicide. Case close. Nothing is to see here people.

Bill made a phone call.

People will be as afraid to speak ill of Hillary as they are in North Korea of Kim Jung-on. All hail our Glorious Leader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Soros Emerges As Mastermind Behind Plan To Enlarge Electorate By At Least 10 Million Democrat Voters

Ever wonder who is behind all the lawsuits filed to overturn state voter ID laws? Those lawsuits are very expensive, after all, racking up 1,000’s of billable hours from some very high-end law firms. Well, courtesy of the 2,500 documents recently released by DC Leaks, we now know that George Soros, the puppetmaster of democrats,  is funding the legal fees as part of his stated goal to “enlarge [the U.S.] electorate by at least 10 million [democrat] voters” by 2018.


The specifics of the plan were discussed at the May 2014 board meeting of the “Open Society Foundations” a liberal grant-making group founded by Soros (the full 222-page presentation from the board meeting can be found at the end of this post). The Society’s first goal under its “Proposed Strategic Framework 2015-2018” was to “strengthen the quality of American democracy through greater inclusion, participation & accountability.” Under the goal, the Society’s top objective was to:

Enlarge [the U.S.] electorate by at least 10 million voters through modernization of voter registration systems, and through expanded constitutional/legislative protections

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Clinton Used “BleachBit” Software To “Prevent Recovery” And “Hide All Traces Of” Deleted Emails

South Carolina Representative Trey Gowdy appeared on Fox News and disclosed new details about the Clinton email scandal that indicated felony intent to destroy evidence.

Gowdy reveals in this clip that Clinton used “BleachBit” to erase the “personal” emails from her private server.

BleachBit is intended to help users delete files in a way to “prevent recovery” and “hide traces of files deleted.”  Per the BleachBit website:

Beyond simply deleting files, BleachBit includes advanced features such as shredding files to prevent recovery, wiping free disk space to hide traces of files deleted by other applications, and vacuuming Firefox to make it faster.

During his appearance on Fox, Gowdy clearly indicates that Clinton’s use of BleachBit undermines her claims that she only deleted innocuous “personal” emails from her private server.

“They didn’t just push the delete button, they had them deleted where even God can’t read them.”

“They were using something called BleachBit.  You don’t use BleachBit for yoga emails.”

“When you’re using BleachBit, it is something you really do not want the world to see.”  You really want to hide your dirty business.

Gowdy also questioned whether Hillary considered “Clinton Foundation” emails to be “personal” and, if not, asked why the FBI’s investigation revealed minimal emails about Foundation-related topics.

So Dear Reader, we leave it to you to decide whether – like FBI Director Comey – you see absolutely no “intent” to hide or obfuscate any of the deleted emails.

Do you really believe Hillary Clinton went as far as using BleachBit to ensure no trace was left of these harmless emails about yoga routines or flavored coffee creamer?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

500% Increase in Cost of EpiPen Thanks To The FDA

Submitted by Jonathan Newman via The Mises Institute,
OmtWMcr (1)
There’s a new bout of outrage over an expensive medicine or medical treatment. While the good in question changes each time, the blame always seems to fall on greedy corporations who just aren’t regulated enough. Free markets and capitalism are the scapegoat, even when nothing remotely resembling unhampered markets in health care is in place in the United States.

This time, it’s the EpiPen, a device that easily and safely injects epinephrine to quickly open up airways for people undergoing severe anaphylaxis because of an extreme allergy. It has saved the lives of countless people who are allergic to bee stings, certain foods, or other drugs because it can be administered on the spot by somebody without any medical training.

EpiPen is sold by Mylan, and the price for a pack of two has increased from about $100 in 2007 to over $600 as of May 2016, a 500% increase. Mylan has tried to quell the storm by pointing out that many of their customers pay nothing for the drug because of insurance. Their deflection has been unsuccessful because most thinking people know someone always pays.

The economist looks for competitors in cases like this. A firm cannot just willy-nilly raise their prices without a competing firm naturally leaping in to give consumers what they want at a lower price.

BUT as it turns out, Mylan has a great friend who keeps would-be competitors out of the market, or at least makes it so difficult for them that they eventually go out of business. That friend is the FDA.

With the FDA, patents, and cozy insurance relationships, Mylan has been able to steadily increase the price of EpiPens without significant market repercussions. Though, the current backlash may push many patients and doctors to look for alternatives. The only problem is that alternatives are few and far between because of government interventions.

Epinephrine is extremely cheap—just a few cents per dose. The complications come from producing the easy auto-injecting devices. Mylan “owns” their auto-injector device design, so competitors must find work-arounds in their devices to deliver the epinephrine into the patient’s body. This task, coupled with the tangled mess of FDA red tape, has proven to be difficult for would-be EpiPen competitors.

A French pharmaceutical company offered an electronic device that actually talks people through the steps of administering the drug, but it was blocked by the FDA recalled because of concerns about it delivering the required dose. Just this year, Teva Pharmaceutical’s attempt at bringing a generic epinephrine injector to market in the US was also blocked by the FDA. Adrenaclick and Twinject were unable to get insurance companies on board and so discontinued their injectors in 2012.

Adrenaclick has since come back, but it is still not covered by many insurance plans, and the FDA has made it illegal for pharmacies to substitute Adrenaclick as a generic alternative to EpiPen. Another company tried to sidestep the whole auto-injector patent barrier by offering prefilled syringes, but the FDA has stalled them, too.

Mylan has been repeatedly protected from competition, and it has repeatedly (and predictably) increased the price of EpiPens in response. Allowing all of these companies to compete in producing epinephrine auto-injectors would be the best course for all of the many patients who want a cheaper solution for severe allergic reactions.

But the FDA and its cozy relationship with Mylan (kickbacks?) is not having it.

One thing is for sure: capitalism is not to blame, it’s the lack of capitalism. Government regulations have choked this market and many others. What we need is a big dose of freedom.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CNN Yesterday: Hillary Health Questions Are ‘Sexist’; CNN Today: We Question Trump’s Health

So which is it CNN? Is it legitimate reporting, or is it sexist?

Yesterday, The Hill reported the following:

New CNN political analyst Kirsten Powers says questioning Hillary Clinton‘s health is “an element of sexism”.

Powers, a former Democratic strategist who just came to CNN told “New Day” co-host Alisyn Camerota that there’s nothing to indicate the Democratic presidential nominee is not in good health.

“Honestly, I think there’s an element of sexism to this,” Powers said. “The way that they’ve talked about her, you know, the way you watch Drudge [Report] posting things about granny and grandma.

Now today, we see CNN’s resident doctor, Sanjay Gupta, questioning Trump’s health. I suppose it’s ok because he’s a man.

Also from The Hill:

CNN’s Sanjay Gupta is casting doubt Donald Trump‘s health, even asking whether the GOP presidential nominee is at risk of heart disease.


“I don’t even know what to make of this letter,” Gupta told CNN’s Ashleigh Banfield on Tuesday, referring to a letter from Dr. Harold Bornstein, who examined Trump last December. “Whether you are a doctor or not, that degree of hyperbole and these words being used is very unusual. People don’t write like that. ‘Strength and stamina are extraordinary.’ What does that mean, exactly?”

During Bill Clinton‘s time as president, Gupta served as a healthcare adviser to Hillary Clinton, Trump’s Democratic opponent in the 2016 election.

On Wednesday, the neurosurgeon went even further in questioning Trump’s health during an appearance on CNN’s morning program, “New Day.”

“Here you have a lot of language with not a lot of data to back it up,” he told host Chris Cuomo while analyzing Bornstein’s letter. “They say he’s on a statin. What’s his cholesterol? You’ve indicated in some way that he has some these types of medicines he’s taking — for what, exactly? Does he have a risk of heart disease?”  We’ve GOT to know these things about Trump’s health!

In a related item, a story by political reporter Gregory Krieg on Wednesday concludes in a headline that “Clinton’s health is fine” and asks “but what about Trump?”

They don’t call it the Clinton News Network for nothing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

FBI Reports Linking Hillary To Vince Foster “Suicide” Suddenly Disappear From National Archives

Vince Foster was deputy White House counsel and Hillary’s friend and law partner who had full knowledge and connections to the Travelgate and Whitewater scandals.

In 1993, as the Travelgate and Whitewater investigations heated up, Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park, along the Potomac River.  His death was ruled a “suicide” resulting from a gun shot from a .38 caliber revolver.

Like a lot of things surrounding the Clintons, Foster’s “suicide” has always been shrouded in mystery.

The lead investigator in independent counsel Robert Fiske’s investigation of the Foster case, Miquel Rodriguez, outlined evidence that the case was fixed.

Thirteen years ago, Rodriguez, an assistant U.S. attorney, made an audio recording in which he charged the suicide ruling was predetermined, the crime scene was altered and major newspaper editors killed stories by reporters pursuing the truth.

“This whole notion of [Fiske and Starr] doing an honest investigation is laughable,” Rodriguez says in the tape.

In his resignation letter, Rodriquez refers to photographs showing a bullet wound on Foster’s neck that was not mentioned in Starr’s official government report.

The obvious questions: How could a suicide victim be found with two wounds, a .38-caliber gunshot into the mouth that exited through his head and another wound on the right side of his neck that one of the paramedics described as a small-caliber bullet hole? And why would the government investigators go to great lengths to cover it up?

In the audio recording, Rodriguez said the accepted verdict, that Foster killed himself at Ft. Marcy Park near Washington, was predetermined by a “higher authority” at the very start of the investigation. Rodriguez noted he did extensive interviews with major newspapers, including the New York Times, that were never published.

“All I know is that things did not happen the way Fiske says that they happened, and the reports don’t support what Fiske said,” Rodriguez stated. “There is nothing consistent with [Foster] committing that kind of violent act at all.”

Rodriguez, who was hired by Starr in 1994 to lead his grand jury investigation, is now an assistant U.S. attorney in Sacramento, California.

And Rodriguez was no conservative, wrote London Telegraph reporter Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in his book, “The Secret Life of Bill Clinton.”

He was very liberal.  “Indeed, when he arrived from California with his ponytail, his earring, and his leather jackets, there were comments among the hard-liners that Kenneth Starr had gone too far in his efforts to recruit Democrats, liberals, and ethnic minorities to his team”, Evans-Pritchard wrote.

Now as old Hillary scandals are questioned again, the Daily Mail is now reporting that an “extensive investigation” has found that FBI reports filed by those former agents have “gone missing” from records stored at the National Archives and Records Service in College Park, MD.  On two occasions, reporters went to the National Archives to review boxes of evidence related to Vince Foster’s death.  While the boxes contained “dozens of FBI reports concerning Foster’s death – including interviews with the medical examiner, U.S. Park Police officers, and White House aides about the contents of Foster’s office” it was now mysteriously missing the reports.

Growing suspicious of the missing reports, The Daily Mail filed a FOIA request with Martha Murphy of the National Archives who subsequently reviewed all of the “relevant FBI files, including those that had not been previously made public.”  An emailed response from Martha Murphy reported that the FBI files requested could still not be found:

“He examined all eight boxes but found no interviews by any investigator that detail either a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster or the effects of a meeting between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster on Vince Foster’s state of mind.  We did not limit ourselves to interviews by the two individuals [FBI agents] you mention.”

But to be clear, according the Director of Communications and Marketing at the National Archives, John Valceanu, just because the FBI agents’ reports could not be located doesn’t mean they’ve been vanished:

‘We do not agree with your conclusion that the records you requested are missing from the National Archives simply because we were unable to locate any responsive records in response to your request.’

Instead, Valceanu suggested the files might just be misplaced among the other 3,000 boxes of records related to the FBI’s investigation into the Clinton’s illegal Whitewater scandal.

It is understandable how difficult it must be to keep track of all the boxes of FBI evidence related to past Clinton scandals, but it does seem suspicious that this specific report would be the one to go missing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WikiLeaks’ Assange Warns Clinton Campaign: More Game-Changing Emails Loom

Last night Fox News aired part 1 of a 2-part interview with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.  Assange noted that they are currently reviewing thousands of pages of new material related to the Hillary campaign which he described as “significant.”  When asked whether the new material will be leaked before the November 8th election, Assange responded “yes, absolutely.”

GettyImages-159924056-hillary-glasses-2 copy“We have a lot of material, thousands of pages of material.  There’s a variety of different types of documents and different types of institutions that are associated with the election campaign, some quite unexpected angles that are, you know, quite interesting, some even entertaining.”

We now know that Assange planned the timing of the previous leaks to correspond with the Democratic National Convention which has since resulted in the dismissal of 5 DNC officials, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz.  We assume this leak will also be timed to maximize it’s effectiveness with speculation swirling that it could be released before one of the scheduled debates in October.

When asked whether the next release could be a “game-changer” in the November Presidential election, Assange replied:

“I think it’s significant.  You know, it depends on how it catches fire in the public and in the media.”

Certainly the traditional media and Wall Street will stand ready to defend it’s chosen candidate, Hillary, and has likely already begun preparations for the expected release.

For her part, Hillary is overtly avoiding the press as she hasn’t hosted a press conference in over 260 days.  Clinton seems to be pursuing a strategy to simply ignore the many controversies surrounding her campaign and run out the clock until election day.  At this point, even the Washington Post thinks Hillary’s lack of engagement with the press is “ridiculous”:

Jokes aside, it’s beyond ridiculous that one of the two people who will be elected president in 80 or so days continues to refuse to engage with the press.

But she does sit-down interviews! And she did a “press conference” with a moderator, um, reading the Clinton prepared questions moderating the questions!

In the end, no amount of proof of Hillary’s criminal activity is going to stop her from the Presidency.  If it has not mattered by now, it is not going to.  It falls on the deaf ears of a stupid electorate that has become so blind that it is willing to fully support a known felon irrespective of whatever new data may be presented about the quality of that candidate.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment