More Fake News From The Fake News Kingdom: The Russia Thing Is Just A Big Nothing Burger”

Project Veritas Exposes CNN’s Van Jones: “The Russia Thing Is Just A Big Nothing Burger”

Yesterday, after dropping his first undercover CNN bombshell, which starred producer John Bonifield admitting that CNN’s endless ‘Russian meddling’ crusade was “mostly b.s.” directed by the network’s CEO Jeff Zucker with the sole intent of spiking ratings, Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe promised there was more to come. And, all we knew was that the subject of the second video would be the super secret anonymous sources and it would be “someone we all knew…”

As it turns out, that ‘someone’ is none other than CNN’s Van Jones who inadvertently got caught revealing his true thoughts on CNN’s ‘Russian meddling’ narrative, namely that the whole story is a “big nothing burger.”

PV Reporter: “What do you think is going to happen this week with the whole Russia thing?”

Van Jones: “The Russia Thing Is Just A Big Nothing Burger”

PV Reporter: “Really?”

Van Jones: “Yeah.”

Here is the full Van Jones footage for your viewing pleasure:

Of course, while we’re happy that Van Jones decided to tell the truth, if only while he thought no one was listening, we do wonder how he intends to explain his seemingly conflicted ‘on-air’ versus ‘off-air’ personalities to his children. As you may recall, Jones was the same distraught CNN commentator who spent election night describing Trump as a “bully” and a “bigot” all while saying that his “biggest fear” was how he could explain Trump’s victory to his children…

Perhaps it’s time to think about how you can explain to your children why you exploited your position and fame to provoke mass hysteria among a divided American electorate, over a story you knew to be false…hysteria which very well could have contributed to a mass shooting that nearly claimed the life of Steven Scalise.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More bad news for the Comedy News Network- CNN Caught Peddling Fake News- Producer Admits Russia Fake News Story Pushed For Ratings

Content originally published at

The investigative journalists at Project Veritas have done it again! Known for their undercover sting operations, such as the one which exposed the DNC’s highly organized network of professional agitators sent to disrupt Trump rallies, voter fraud, or the undercover operation which led to the arrests of Antifa thugs planning to disrupt an the inauguration “deploraball” event.

This time, the organization led by James O’Keefe has infiltrated CNN…

A PV journalist covertly filmed a candid discussion with CNN producer John Bonifield, where the “Very Fake News” network employee admitted that the whole Russia story against President Trump is nothing more than a ratings grab by CNN’s CEO Jeff Zucker – based on the fact that most of CNN’s liberal audience wants to see the President go down in flames.

Bonifield also admitted that he hasn’t seen any evidence of President Trump committing a crime.

John Bonifield: Even if Russia was trying to swing an election, we try to swing their elections, our CIA is doing shit all the time, we’re out there trying to manipulate governments.

I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the President committed a crime.

I know a lot of people don’t like him and they’d like to see him get kicked out of office…. but that’s a lot different than he actually did something that can get him kicked out of office.

Russia is for ratings!

PV Journalist: Why is CNN constantly like “Russia this, Russia that?”

Bonifield: Because it’s ratings. Our ratings are incredible right now.

My boss, I shouldn’t say this, my boss yesterday we were having a discussion about this dental shoot and he was like I just want you to know what we’re up against here. Just to give you some context, President Trump pulled out of the climate accords. For a day and a half we covered the climate accords. And the CEO of CNN [Jeff Zucker] said in our internal meeting, he said good job everybody covering the climate accords, but we’re done with it. Let’s get back to Russia.

But all the nice cutesy little ethics that used to get talked about in journalism school, you’re just like, that’s adorable. That’s adorable. This is a business.

True feelings about Russia…

John Bonifield was asked directly what he thinks about Russia… and responded with what many on the right have been saying for months; If it was something really good, it would have already leaked:

PV Journalist: But honestly, you think the whole Russia shit is just bullshit?

Bonifield: Could be bullshit. I mean, it’s mostly bullshit right now. Like, we don’t have any giant proof. Then they say, “well there’s still an investigation going on.” I don’t know, if they were finding something we would know about it. They way these leaks happen, they would leak it. They’d leak. If it was something really good, it’d leak.

I just feel like they don’t really have it but they want to keep digging. And so I think the President is probably right to say, like “look, you are witch hunting me. You have no smoking gun, you have no real proof.”


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Three CNN Employees ‘Resign’ Over ‘Russia Collusion’ Fake News Retraction

It’s getting bad when even liberals can see their own liberal bias.

A few days ago CNN was forced to retract yet another one of their bombshell ‘Russian collusion’ stories when it was apparently revealed that the whole thing was nothing more than their latest, anonymously (fake) sourced fake news debacle. Like most CNN stories on the topic, this one carried a salacious title (“Congress was investigating a Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials”) which implied some nefarious plot by the Trump administration to stage a coup in the United States.

Within 36 hours, however, CNN was forced to retract the entire story and issue an apology to Anthony Scaramucci (presumably before they got sued in court).

That story did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted. Links to the story have been disabled. CNN apologizes to Mr. Scaramucci.

Now, according to a new report from the Washington Post, the fake story has resulted in the ‘resignation’ of three CNN ‘journalists, including the Pulitzer Prize winner, Thomas Frank.

Now for the consequences. CNN announced on Monday afternoon that three network officials are leaving their jobs over the incident: Frank, the reporter on the story; Eric Lichtblau, a recent CNN addition from the New York Times who edited the piece; and Lex Haris, the executive editor of “CNN Investigates.” The moves follow an investigation carried out by CNN executives over the weekend, with the conclusion that longstanding network procedures for publishing stories weren’t properly followed. “There was a significant breakdown in process,” says a CNN source. “There were editorial checks and balances within the organization that weren’t met.”

The official CNN statement: “In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on, CNN has accepted the resignations of the employees involved in the story’s publication.”

Regarding the personnel changes, a CNN source said, “The individuals all stated that they accepted responsibility and wanted to resign.” A compelling wrinkle in the saga of the story springs from the careful language in the editor’s note: “That story did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted. CNN apologizes to Mr. Scaramucci,” it reads. CNN is not bailing on all the factual representations in the story, however. “We pulled it down not because we disproved it,” says a CNN source, adding that there was “enough concern” on some factual points that “given the breach in process, we decided to pull it down.”

Of course, this is hardly the first time CNN has been caught reporting fake news recently (see “Looks Like CNN’s Anonymous Sources Got This One Wrong”) and we doubt it will be the last.

Despite their claim that they deleted the story, it is still there if you search…

Is it any wonder that Americans are becoming increasingly frustrated by the media’s attention to the ‘Russia’ narrative that is is constantly spewed with no mind for factual reporting?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Liberals OUTRAGED At Fed Up Texan’s Billboard BLASTING ABC For Russia-Trump Fake News

Forget the Russians, if you really want to know who is meddling in our elections look at the fake polls which are full of democrat oversampling and other dirty tricks conducted by the media leading up to an election. These fake polls have one purpose: to drum up fake support for their democrat candidate.

In the latest Georgia race, Real Clear Politics Poll had Democrat Ossoff winning by a landslide a few days before the election…for those keeping track that’s over a 10.6 point polling ‘error’ from how things actually turned out.

And if ABC hasn’t gotten the message by now that Americans are fed up with their fake news about Russian interference, perhaps they’ll get it now.

Story below by Allan Stein

A San Antonio area well-driller dug deep into his own pockets and paid for a large billboard that has been put up on the side of I-10 and Buckskin Drive.

Buckskin Drive is about as Texas sounding as one can get, but we digress.

The massive open-air missive reads:

“ABC News: I grew up with you. We are through. The Russians didn’t elect Donald Trump. I did.”

Kyle Courtney of Wellstar Groundwater Technologies has been in the business for the past 30 years. That’s a lot of evening news for one man’s eyes and ears. But now Courtney has had enough of all the ABC nonsense about Russians swinging the election in favor of Trump.

In a statement to SBG San Antonio, Courtney wrote:

“ABC News was the only channel I watched as a child growing up in Texas but I think they have lost touch with America and forgotten the working man. They don’t represent our voice anymore. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign was funded by the Clinton Foundation in close coordination with the media, and now we’re seeing them try to fix what they couldn’t fix during the election. They are doing everything they can, night after night, to create narratives and sway people’s direction to impeach Donald Trump. Our democracy is at stake when a major political party and the media are in bed together. I’m not asking anyone to boycott the Democratic party. I’m not in the brainwashing business, but the liberal media is.”

Any good conservative knows it was the millions of other good conservatives who elected Trump and not some alleged Russian hacker walled up in Siberia who somehow convinced them to vote for Trump.

ABC added insult to fake news injury in April when it abruptly canceled Tim Allen’s hugely popular sitcom “Last Man Standing” after Tim Allen made a joke about Russian hacking.  ABC swears it wasn’t a political maneuver to appeal liberal haters of the show. Rather, it was a business decision.


But it was music to the ears of LMS viewers when CMT officials announced “preliminary talks” about reviving the show.

Courtney may be preaching to the choir in his native San Antonio area but the message of his billboard rings loud and clear: start reporting the news, ABC. And don’t mess with Texas.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

It’s “1984” in Germany


Those who violate speech limits face up to 5 years in jail

Angela Merkel – jack-boot thug

Writing this could land you in prison for 5 years:

“I dislike the muslim religion, it doesn’t hold the same values that I hold and seems to push some of it’s followers into committing heinous acts.”

WASHINGTON – German police recently raided the homes of 36 people accused of writing “hateful” posts on social media, but almost all of the raids targeting right-wing individuals.

Thirty-three of the raids concerned “politically motivated right-wing incitement,” while only two raids targeted people accused of left-wing / Muslim extremist content. One of the raids targeted someone accused of making threats based on sexual orientation, according to the New York Times.

“Our free society must not allow a climate of fear, threat, criminal violence and violence either on the street or on the internet,” said Holger Münch, president of the Federal Criminal Police Office.

According to German law, social media users face up to five years in prison for “inciting racial hatred,” even if no physical violence is committed.

“Meanwhile, Islamists mow down people with cars and trucks at Christmas markets in Germany,” said Paul Nehlen, who recently announced he will challenge House Speaker Paul Ryan in Wisconsin’s 1st congressional district primary in 2018.

“It’s madness. German authorities are backing their own citizens into a corner with these types of draconian measures. When did Germany become Cuba, jailing people for political dissent? I’ve heard some of the never-Trumper crowd in the U.S. and in Europe refer to German Chancellor Angela Merkel as the new leader of the free world. I wonder how those jailed German citizens living under Merkel’s jack-boot feel about her ‘free-world leadership.’”

Welp. That ought to stop bombings, stabbings, pavement mountings, fires, shootings, beatings, rapes, druggings, kidnappings, groomings, etc

— Paul Nehlen (@pnehlen) June 21, 2017

This week, a similar situation arose in Sussex, a county in southeast England. A man who posted “hateful” comments on Facebook was sentenced to 20 months of prison for each of the eight counts of “publishing threatening written material intending to stir up religious hatred against Muslims” with which he was charged.

“I hope the sentence handed down by the court on Friday acts as a deterrent to others and sends a reassuring message to those who may be directly targeted or are more widely affected by people’s use of social media to spread messages of fear and hate,” said Sussex Police Hate Crime Sgt. Peter Allan in a statement.

“I encourage people who witness such content, to report it to the provider of the social media platform, but such reports can also be made to us online.”

But supporters of the Islamic terror group Hezbollah openly called for the annihilation of Israel at a public rally in London during the same week, were not even approached by police.

Simon Johnson of the Jewish Leadership Council blasted law enforcement for the apparent double standard.

“I am convinced we’ve been caught in a bit of a civil service paralysis. … Now that we’ve suffered terrible terrorist outrages in this country – surely now is the time to be able to ban the flag of Hezbollah.”

The double standard was mirrored earlier in the month, when British police arrested 25 people for “hate crimes” following the London Bridge terrorist attack that killed eight and wounded another 48. Meanwhile, 12 potential terrorists arrested in connection with the London attack and 22 arrested in connection with the Manchester attack in May were released without charge.

After the London Bridge attack, British law-enforcement social media accounts made it clear they would go after those who posted anti-Muslim content on the Internet.

“Hate crime can take many forms including verbal or online abuse on social media. If you see it, report it,” police in Cheshire, a county in northwest England, tweeted in the aftermath of the attack.

According to Europol, left-wing extremists carried out 27 times more terror attacks in Europe than right-wingers in 2016. There were 27 left-wing attacks, but just one-right wing terror attack recorded.

“Left-wing attacks take many forms,” says Nehlen. “Look at the case of the leftist/Islamist alliance mutating in the United States. You have Islamist Linda Sarsour suggesting that Muhammad was a human rights activist, a feminist and the first victim of the laughably dangerous term Islamophobia. She was part of a demonstration that ran concurrent to President Trump’s inauguration. Over 200 people were charged with felonious behavior such as breaking windows, throwing bricks, large rocks, pieces of concrete at uniformed law enforcement officers.”

In Europe, 13 out of 142 terror attacks were carried out by Islamic jihadists, and these attacks led to the vast majority of deaths. One hundred thirty five of the 142 terror deaths in Europe in 2016 were the result of Islamic terror.”

“Europe is under siege,” Nehlen said. “Intimidating and jailing the most vocal part of your populace isn’t going to stop the problem. Quite the contrary. What European nations are inadvertently telling their citizens is that they will, at some point in the very near future, need to physically engage the invasion force themselves. Speaking out against the invasion won’t result in help from your government, it will get you removed from the battlefield.”

”Wage the Battle: Putting America First in the Fight to Stop Globalist Politicians and Secure the Borders” is a call to action. It is the amazing story of how self-described “manufacturing guy” Paul Nehlen took on Speaker of the House Paul Ryan in one of the most closely followed congressional races in the nation. Nehlen’s run presaged the international movement against globalism, which reached its climax with the election of President Donald Trump. It’s a firsthand look at the development of one of the original “Trump Republicans” and the populist message that is sending shockwaves through the Beltway Right.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Democrats’ pick for 2020? Joe Biden

Elizabeth Warren (Fauxcahontas), Al Franken, and all the other nut jobs are trailing Crazy Joe in new survey

The favorite for the 2020 Democratic nomination is a familiar face: Barack Obama’s vice president, crazy, drunken Joe Biden.

A new poll from Morning Consult and Politico has Biden commanding either a “very favorable” or “somewhat favorable” opinion rating from 74 percent of Democrats, far outpacing the 51 percent garnered by the second-place finisher, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

And Biden is fueling the speculation he is preparing for a presidential run by talking it up in his frequent speaking engagements around the country.

A Democratic operative quoted in the publication claims Biden “would love the opportunity” to run and is emerging as one of the leaders of the party.

The Democrats are in a shambles following the victory of Republican Karen Handel in the special election in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District Tuesday. Many perceive the party as lacking leaders, direction and even a purpose beyond opposition to the agenda of President Donald Trump.

Cue Crazy Joe.

One of the men who has followed Joe Biden’s career most closely, veteran editor and reporter Mike Towle, argues Biden is perfectly poised to emerge as the new leader of the Democrats.

Towle chronicled the former vice president’s propensity for verbal malapropisms in his book “Biden Time: Crazy Uncle Joe In His Own Words.”

But despite Biden’s reputation for putting his foot in his mouth, Towle warns Republicans that Biden should never be underestimated.

Towle argues Biden would have been a more formidable candidate in 2016 than Hillary Clinton, who was arguably doomed by her reputation for scandal.

“He had a lot less baggage, a stronger political resume and a more palatable personality than Hillary,” Towle said.

Even Biden’s gaffes, he argued, give him a certain charm [if you like having a drunk stupid uncle hanging around groping your friends and family members]:

“If we do everything 100% right, if we do it with absolute certainty, there’s still a 30% chance we’re going to get it wrong.” Joe Biden, Feb. 6, 2009

“I mean, you got the first African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man.” Joe Biden, describing fellow candidate Barack Obama. The remark was made the same day Biden filed the official paperwork to launch his presidential campaign. Biden later said the remark was taken out of context.

“In Delaware, the largest growth of population is Indian Americans, moving from India. You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking.” — Joe Biden, captured on C-SPAN’s “Road to the White House” series, trying to bond with voters.

“I started thinking as I was coming over here, Why is it that Joe Biden is the first in his family ever to go to a university?” — Joe Biden, during his first presidential run in 1987, lifting exact passages and even exact gestures from a speech by Neil Kinnock without giving credit to the leader of the British Labour Party.

Biden’s problems continued when C-SPAN footage surfaced two weeks later showing Biden lying about his academic record at law school. (His claims included one that he finished in the top half of his class at Syracuse Law School; he graduated 76th of 85.) Though he later called the accusations of plagiarism “much ado about nothing,” he dropped out of the race on Sept. 23.

Vice President Joe Biden, center, kisses a niece of incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., left, with McConnell’s wife, former Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, on the head during a ceremonial re-enactment swearing-in ceremony, Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2015, in the Old Senate Chamber of Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 17: Ashton Carter (R) makes remarks after he was sworn in as U.S. Secretary of Defense as his wife Stephanie (2nd L) Vice President Joe Biden (L) listen February 17, 2015 in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC. Carter has become the 25th U.S. Secretary of Defense. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

However, Biden has one important disadvantage going into 2020: He’s an old straight white male in a party increasingly defined by its championing of “diversity,” diversity being interpreted as identity politics for those who are not straight white males.

Towle anticipates Biden will receive resistance from the far left if he throws his hat in the ring.

That said, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is even older than Biden, and top Democrats already believe the self-described socialist plans to make a repeat run for the Oval Office.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Imagine If A Trump Supporter Had Shot A Democratic Congressman

‘Hysteria is to the left as oxygen is to biological life’

by Dennis Prager

What would have happened if a Trump supporter had shot a Democratic congressman and other Democratic Washington officials?

The answer is obvious.

The New York Times, the rest of the left-wing media and the Democratic Party would have made the shootings the dominant issue in American life. It is not possible to understand the left – and, therefore, the media and the current state of American life – without understanding how the left uses and relies on hysteria. Hysteria is to the left as oxygen is to biological life.

From the moment Donald Trump was elected president, America has been drowning in left-wing hysteria, all fomented by the media and the Democratic Party.

The charge of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign is hysteria. The claim that the president engaged in obstruction of justice is hysteria. As I have pointed out, the charge of Trump’s election unleashing hate and anti-Semitism, which dominated American media for months, was hysteria.

If Democrats had been shot by a Trump supporter, all you would be hearing and reading about is how much hate the Trump election has unleashed in America, how his election is threatening our democracy and how he is unleashing fascism.

But it was a not a Trump supporter who attempted to murder a Democratic congressman, Capitol Police officers, a House GOP aide and a lobbyist; it was a Trump-hating leftist who attempted to murder a Republican congressman and other Republican officials. And, for that reason, what would have been the dominant issue in America today is already a nonissue. The shooting took place on Wednesday. On Friday, the only article about it on The New York Times front page was about the “harmony” engulfing Democrats and Republicans in the wake of the shooting. By Saturday, there was nothing about the shooting on the front page.

The “harmony” issue is worth noting. As sure as the sun rises in the east, had a Trump-supporting fanatic shot Democratic officials, the Democrats would not have said a word about the need for “harmony,” or the need to lower the temperature in American political discourse. On the contrary, they would have greatly raised the temperature of their already blistering rhetoric. They would have attributed the shooting entirely to Trump’s “hateful” rhetoric having permeated conservative and Republican America.

But it was a leftist who attempted to slaughter Republicans, so it was Republicans who had to respond. And they did so by calling for harmony and lowering the temperature of political differences.

In other words, Republicans reacted with complete conciliation, whereas, the Democrats and their media would have gone ballistic against the right.

Now, why is that?

One reason is that Republicans have accepted the post-shooting narrative of there being some sort of moral equivalence between right-wing and left-wing hate. That they have reinforces my belief that the great majority of Republicans and conservatives, whether in politics or in the media, do not appreciate how rotten the left is (the left – not traditional liberals). Many really believe that calls for “harmony” and “unity” with Democrats and the left are meaningful.

But the only reason Democrats talked about harmony for a few days after the shooting was one of theirs was the shooter.

Even during the three-day “harmony” period, the left was busy furthering the falsehood that there is quantitative and qualitative equivalence between right-wing and left-wing hate. As evidence, a New York Times editorial said: “Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl. At the time, we and others were sharply critical of the heated political rhetoric on the right. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map that showed the targeted electoral districts of Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs.”

A Republican putting crosshairs on vulnerable Democrat districts on a map is the worst the Times could come up with. And that is apparently equivalent to all the hate directed at President Trump: calling opposition to him “resistance,” as if Democrats were the French resistance and Trump were a Nazi; Kathy Griffin holding President Trump’s mock severed head with blood gushing out; Stephen Colbert saying on his TV show that Trump’s mouth would make a good “c–- holster” for Russian President Vladimir Putin; and so much more unprecedented hate.

The difference between what has happened after these shootings and what would have happened had a right-winger shot Democratic officials is, in a nutshell, the moral difference between the left and the right; and between Democrats and Republicans.



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment