If This Is “Transparency” – We’d Hate To Know What Secrecy Looks Like

“My administration is the most transparent administration in history,” from the mouth of Barack Obama February 7, 2013

“Those radical Tea-party grannies are a dangerous bunch!” from the mind of Barack Obama

Originally from Claire Bernish via TheAntiMedia.org…

In the spirit of the transparency — of which the Obama administration claims to be THE champion — there will be no details regarding the allocation of non-military intelligence spending in the president’s final budget request to Congress.

According to a press release from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), fiscal year 2017’s budget totals $53.5 billion, but don’t ask which agencies or programs will receive the funds — “because such disclosures could harm national security” even though this is domnestic spending.

Of course, the ODNI congratulated the self-titled most transparent administration in history for its laudatory lucidity, anyway.

Yawn…this is not even news anymore.

“Reflecting the Administration’s commitment to transparency and open government, this Budget continues the practice begun in 2012 of disclosing the President’s aggregate funding requests for the [National Intelligence Program],” stated an ODNI fact sheet.

Blah, blah blah…

Considering such disclosures became a requirement under the law in 2010, that pat on the back seems superfluous, if not smug.

“That’s a business as usual claim,” said Representative Peter Welch, according to US News & World Report. “There is no transparency there…members of Congress and the American public really are learning nothing.”

US News also reported Welch only learned of the 16 individual intelligence agencies’ budget allocations, along with the rest of the U.S. populace, thanks to Edward Snowden’s disclosures revealed by the Washington Post in 2013.

Welch also explained that although members of Congress aren’t restricted from viewing the specifics of intelligence program appropriations, they are prohibited from discussing the contents — “It’s like going in there with a blindfold and coming out being mute,” he mused. In fact, objecting to the classified budget allotments would mean being “escorted off the House floor in handcuffs” — though it wasn’t entirely apparent whether Welch intended sarcasm in saying so.

Despite the revelations in Snowden’s massive document releases, and his ambitious aspirations to bring transparency to governmental operations, the Obama administration continues to thwart all attempts to force the matter — and not only will it continue to do so, but administrations that follow will almost certainly continue the pattern now set in stone by “the most transparent administration in history.”

In the meantime, it should come as no shock that we will never be privy to the domestic intelligence programs we fund through our taxes.

Since there is no reason to hide the fact that you are spying on possible terrorists, and there is obviously something Obama wants to keep hidden, you have to assume (and all evidence shows) he is spying on folks like this…


Those radical Tea-party grannies are a dangerous bunch!


About avirginiapatriot1776

I hope we have once again reminded people that man is not free unless government is limited. There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: as government expands, liberty contracts. — Ronald Reagan
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave your name and comment (info below comment box is optional)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s