Arizona Cop Acquitted For Murdering Crawling White Man Who Was Begging For His Life

The victim was white.

That means:
NO Jessie Sharpton to lead a march.
NO white people burning down the city.
NO MSM interviewing people on the scene and showing a video of a door for weeks on end.

White sheeple just put their heads down and go to work so they can pay taxes to support more of the same.

by Scott Shackford of

Arizona jurors watched the video below, which shows former Mesa, Arizona, police officer Philip Mitchell Brailsford shooting and killing a man who was begging for his life and attempting to follow the officer’s twisted game of Simon Says and crawl without using his hands down a hotel hallway.

Yet the jurors found Brailsford not guilty of second-degree murder and reckless manslaughter. Do you agree? (Warning: The video is pretty graphic.)

Can you imagine the national outrage if the victim had been black?

The incident occurred in January 2016. Daniel Shaver, white, apparently was showing off a pellet gun, and it was visible through the hotel room window. This promped somebody to call to the hotel front desk, which prompted a call to the police.

So it wasn’t unreasonable for police to approach the hotel room thinking the encounter might be dangerous. They knew there was a gun there, and they didn’t know it was a pellet gun. But that video shows some truly baffling decisions by Brailsford that escalated the situation to make it even scarier, not the least of which was that Brailsford’s bluster and open threats of murder made the cop appear mentally deranged

The contents of the body camera footage had been described to the public before, when Brailsford was first charged, but the video itself was withheld until this morning. NBC notes:

The investigator noted he did not see anything that would have prevented officers from simply handcuffing Shaver as he was on the floor.

Forcing Shaver to crawl without using his hands toward the police like this increased the likelihood that Shaver would lose balance and make wild movements, and Brailsford’s bizarre orders were probably confusing even to a sober person.

Oh, and here’s an interesting detail from the Arizona Republic:

The judge did not allow jurors to hear about an etching on the dust cover of the rifle Brailsford used to shoot Shaver, which said “You’re f–ked,” because he felt it was prejudicial.

Brailsford was fired for poor performance two months after the shooting. Would anybody care to bet that he tries either to get his job back in Mesa or to get a job with another law enforcement agency elsewhere?

Just don’t pull that stunt on a black man or he will end up with life in prison.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Whites are now second class citizens

A 19 year old Chicago woman who live-streamed a hate crime which included kidnapping, torture and mutilation of a mentally disabled white teen was given 200 hours of community service and four years of probation on Friday.

Brittany Herring Covington – who went by “Herring” on Social Media before her arrest, and “Covington” in recent reports, avoided a 33 years in prison on multiple counts, including a hate crime, aggravated battery and aggravated kidnapping – a charge which was dropped along with several others as part of a plea agreement.

Tanisha Covington, Tesfaye Cooper, Brittany Herring Covington, Jordan Hill and victim


Cook County Circuit Judge William Hooks handed down the slap on the wrist to Covington, who pleaded guilty to a hate crime, aggravated battery and intimidation charges. Hooks is notably the first African-American president of Chicago’s Federal Bar Association, and a member of the Muslim Bar Association of Chicago.


The brutal attack took place in early January, after four black Chicago teens kidnapped the mentally disabled white teen and held him captive for nearly two days – binding his hands and feet with duct tape and gagging him with a sock, before using a knife to cut and stab the victim while laughing, shouting racial slurs and issuing death threats. In one segment of the livestreamed attack, one of the females can be seen laughing as she punches the victim. At another point, one of the male attackers wraps a cord around the victim’s neck while he groaned in pain, and in another a male approaches the victim with a knife and asks the others “Should I shank his ass?” Other notable quotes include:

“F*** Donald Trump, F*** all white people”

“There’s gonna be a murder. Pop pop pop”

“We gonna put this b**ch in the trunk, put a brick on the gas, like aaaaaaaaah”

“Pistol whip his a**, fool“

After nearly 48 hours, the kidnapped teen managed to escaped after the kidnappers left the apartment to confront a neighbor who had called 911 to complain about the noise coming out of their apartment where the torture was taking place.

The videos, which can be seen here immediately went viral.

After the teens were arrested, Chicago PD initially said it was not racially motivated, despite it clearly being a hate crime. Jordan Hill, 18, of Carpentersville; Tesfaye Cooper, 18, of Chicago; and Brittany Herring’s sister Tanishia, 24, all adults, were each charged with aggravated kidnapping, hate crimes, aggravated unlawful restraint and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon.

After her arrest, Brittany Herring Covington bragged on Facebook from a smart phone she was able to sneak into jail, posting “yall mad?” and “Sittin in dis cell on my celly talking to yall trippin. Erbody got phones in her these day,” and typing “Tfse” which stands for “The Funniest Sh*t Ever.”

Zero remorse:

And for her participation in the brutal crime, Herring-Covington only received 200 hours of community service and four years of probation.

Meanwhile, a white Broward County, Florida man who broke into a Mosque and left bacon inside was sentenced to 15 years in prison last week.

The three other kidnappers charged along with Herring-Covington are still awaiting trial. Perhaps Judge Hooks will give them the key to the city.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You’ve heard of angel tree toppers, but how about a devil?

Again, this is NOT the onion

For those still traumatized by the 2016 election, a company is offering a Hillary Clinton Christmas Tree Topper for only $950.00

Pantsuited figure ‘looks like the Pillsbury dough boy with wings’

The newly released ornament, made by U.K.-based nonprofit Women to Look Up To, is one of a trio of “bada– women” honored by the organization in 2017. The other two, tennis player Serena Williams and entertainer Beyoncé, were offered earlier, but, according to the company, the third – Hillary Clinton – was chosen based on a popular vote by visitors to the website.

Not exactly Mount Rushmore, but at least an election Hillary could finally win.

“Every Christmas we place a ‘topper’ […] made of no more than plastic and glitter on top of trees. For many, she has lost her meaning, which is why Women To Look Up To have created a range of modern female role models to place on top instead,” reads the website.

“In 2017 make your Christmas tree angel-fairy topper an inspiring kicka– woman worthy of wings and celebration – a Serena, a Beyoncé or a woman voted for by you.

“3D-sculpted to order from the highest grade plaster, our Angel Christmas Tree Toppers come in a range of sizes to suit your home, office or event Christmas tree. We ship your order insured, tracked and signed for anywhere in the world.

“They aren’t any old Christmas tree toppers. They are ‘Women To Look Up To.’”

Unsurprisingly, Hillary Clinton – even as a tree topper – doesn’t come cheap. The high-grade sculpture is being sold for between $100 and $950, depending on tree size.

While this might be the perfect gift for the triggered Democrat on anyone’s Christmas list, Republicans feeling left out can have a tree-topper angel made to order of anyone, provided that person comes to the organization’s London studio for a 3-D scanning.

Critics of Trump’s victory – who, fittingly with the season, have been dubbed “snowflakes” by conservatives – have started the #Resistmas movement on social media.

The nonprofit promises Hillary – in “her iconic power suit with angelic wings” – will be “the most presidential of tree toppers.”

“She’s the first lady of Christmas tree decorations.”

Touting Clinton’s roles as presidential candidate, secretary of state and first lady, she is called “a woman steeped in successes, but not deterred by failure.”

Needless to say, social media weighed in on Hillary’s latest honor.

“OMG, she’s wearing the white pantsuit she wore in the third debate with Trump. Looks like the Pillsbury doughboy with wings,” commented Gayle Love on Fox News.

“It will fall over and have to be carried into the van,” warned Curtis Brown.

“Remove the wings, add horns, pitch fork and a tail,” said a Twitter user, to which a responder added, “Now you are embarrassing the devil.”

“Put this on your tree & when you wake up Christmas morning you’ll find a reindeer who ‘committed suicide’ on your front lawn, and 20% of your Christmas presents will have been sold to the Russians.”

“Guaranteed to scare off Santa.”

“Just like the real Hillary it’s overpriced, entirely artificial, smells of eggnog and can’t quite reach the ceiling. Available where her book ’50 Shades of Blame’ is sold.”

Can’t afford the pricey tree topper? Not to worry — Women to Look Up To have a line of Christmas cards featuring Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama as angels. Purchasers are encouraged to “take the time and effort to write messages of empowerment and gratitude to the women we love.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Plexiglass Is Racist In Philadelphia – Not The Onion!!!

Truth is stranger that fiction again.

Go ahead.  Keep voting democrat and see just how stupid things can get.

by Chris Menahan via,


That’s right.  According to Philadelphia 8th District Councilwoman Cindy Bass, shopkeepers protecting themselves with bulletproof plexiglass represents a racist “indignity” to her constituents and should therefore be banned.


For Jeff Liu, the thick plexiglass window that separates him from patrons at his Germantown beer deli, Kenny’s Seafood & Steak, is a matter of safety. For City Councilwoman Cindy Bass, the barrier window is an insult.

The plexiglass partition serves to protect workers from crime, but it also cuts them off from customers — a literal and metaphorical divider between their worlds.

Several years ago, after Liu argued with a man selling drugs in his Wayne Avenue deli’s lobby, the man returned with a rifle and shot Liu’s car, shattering its windows, Liu said.

Bass says the windows only foster a sense that the establishment – more specifically, its clientele – is dangerous. And that too many of those stores masquerade as eateries when their biggest sales draw is alcohol, feeding vices in the city’s struggling neighborhoods.

“It’s an indignity” to buy a meal through such a window, she said.

[…]Yale sociology professor Elijah Anderson, who has written extensively on Philadelphia’s urban environment said the plexiglass window sets up “a symbol of distrust” in neighborhoods where many African Americans live.

“Of course some people are bad, but most people who come to that window are good, and they’re not trusted either. That angers, alienates them,” said Anderson, who previously taught at the University of Pennsylvania. “They know they’re civil, honest people. They’re hit with this symbol of distrust and it works on your psyche in subtle ways. You know that you’re devalued as a customer.” So you have to go get a shotgun and kill people.

But Adam Xu, 54, chairman of the Asian American Licensed Beverage Association of Philadelphia, said the protective window should be a business owner’s choice. His association represents 217 beer delis in the city, about 70 percent of which are owned by people who are ethnic Chinese and another 20 percent of Korean descent.

“Most of our businesses,” he said, “are in not-as-safe neighborhoods.”

You may think preventing your shopkeepers from being murdered is of prime importance, but is that really more important than preventing hurt feelings?

Take down your glass, unlock your doors, hand over your guns and prepare to get “social justice” handed to you good and hard.

Of course plexiglass is racist…why do you think there are so few black hockey players in the NHL?

And metal detectors at federal buildings, airports, court houses, and sporting arenas is racyss too.

And if it’s indignant to buy meals through such a window, then it’s time to shut-down all drive-throughs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Liberalism is a cancer that’s killing America!

by Scott Greer via The Daily Caller,

The illegal immigrant who fired the illegal gun, three times, that killed Kate Steinle was able to beat a murder charge this week.

32 year old Kate Steinle, killed by convicted felon and 5 time deported illegal immigrant


Jose Garcia Zarate, a five-time deportee from Mexico and convicted felon, walked away with only a gun conviction after his legal team convinced the jury their client accidentally fired a gun three times and had no intent of killing anyone.

Surveillance video showed Garcia Zarate running away after firing 3 shots into a crowd of people. After his arrest, investigators found gunshot residue on his right hand, prosecutor Diana Garcia told jurors.

Garcia Zarate faced a charge of second-degree murder, but jurors also were allowed to consider first-degree murder and involuntary manslaughter convictions.

He walked without any convictions.

Prosecutors said Garcia Zarate was playing his own “secret version of Russian roulette” and deliberately fired into an unsuspecting crowd on the pier, killing Steinle.

Defense attorney Matt Gonzalez said Garcia Zarate found the gun at the pier. He said it was wrapped in cloth, and when Garcia Zarate unwrapped it, the gun accidentally discharged.

But in a police interrogation, Garcia Zarate admitted to firing the gun, saying he was aiming at a seal.

The Steinle case has attracted national attention ever since her murder occurred in 2015 in the sanctuary city of San Francisco. The murder became the focal point in the debate over illegal immigration, showing the dangers of sanctuary city policies and how America can’t secure its borders from convicted felons with multiple deportations.

Presidential candidate Donald Trump highlighted the murder several times on the campaign trail for why America needs to get tough on illegal immigration and eliminate sanctuary city policies.

There was always a political element to the case, and that comes into play as to why a San Francisco jury sought fit to let Zarate go free without even an involuntary manslaughter charge.

The prosecution team does warrant some of the blame for why that occurred. As RedState’s Sarah Rumpf argued, prosecutorial overreach trying to get a harder to prove first-degree murder charge bears some responsibility for the exoneration of Zarate for Kate’s killing.

However, that factor can’t be solely responsible for the not guilty verdict for an illegal immigrant who somehow accidentally fired off a gun three times with no malicious intent in mind.

San Francisco is a very liberal area and jury selection, according to Zarate’s defense team, was ensured to better benefit their client.

“We are very pleased with the jury,” said Matt Gonzalez, the lead defense lawyer for Zarate, upon the completion of jury selection.

“We have such great diversity built in in San Francisco and I think we have a jury that understands a lot of the concerns about the defendant receiving a fair trial.”

That diversity was reflected in the jury consisting of three immigrants, at least one of whom’s primary language was Spanish. Potential jurors were quizzed about their thoughts on immigration, Latinos, guns and crime when being taken into consideration.

Gonzalez also asked them how they would be fine with a verdict that came out contrary to President Trump’s wishes.

While the judge presiding over the case urged the jury to leave aside their opinions on immigration and guns and focus on the facts, it was always hard for this case to escape from politics.

Juries don’t always make the right decision, as anyone who is still upset by O.J. Simpson walking free can attest. The Steinle case seems to be emblematic for how America’s legal system seems incapable of adequately dealing with immigration issues.

Zarate should’ve never been in the country to begin with, yet a San Francisco prison let him go free while under a sixth deportation order three months before Steinle’s murder. All thanks to sanctuary city policies.

And this isn’t the only case where the legal system failed to find justice for illegal immigrant crime.

In October, a Texas woman who lost her husband and two children to a car crash caused by an illegal immigrant expressed outrage that the man responsible only received a two-year sentence for the crime.

In May, an Oregon circuit court overturned the conviction for an illegal immigrant who ran over and killed two girls playing in a leaf pile. The court bought the driver’s story that she didn’t realize she ran over anything as she drove away from the scene of the killing.

That reversed conviction was not for vehicular homicide, but for the driver being found guilty of failing to perform her duties as a driver. The courts also managed to dismiss her deportation case over the incident.

There’s also the example of San Francisco feeling embolden to continue to defend their sanctuary city policies, which give protection to illegal immigrants from deportation, after the Steinle verdict.

A convicted felon who will apparently fire off guns without thinking isn’t exactly the poster boy you want for your policies, but San Fran seems comfortable with that association.

Then again, the city should feel emboldened by how the courts continue to strike down the immigration orders of the president.

Even more important than the individual cases of leniency given to illegal immigrant criminals is how the courts are presently shaping our country’s immigration policy.

The White House has sought to punish jurisdictions that refuse to follow federal immigration law, yet courts have blocked the administration’s attempt to do so. In November, a U.S. district judge in California ruled the administration could not reduce federal funding to sanctuary cities because it “will cause them constitutional injuries.”

Earlier the same month, another U.S. district court judge argued from the bench that the Department of Justice was wrong to say a city was failing to meet law enforcement requirements by giving protection to illegal aliens.

Even more expansive than these court arguments on sanctuary cities is the legal system’s opinion on who the government can bar from entry into the country.

Increasingly, the courts have inched towards the opinion that the federal government cannot restrict immigration from any part of the world. The various versions of Trump’s travel ban have been knocked down by the courts for the alleged reason they discriminate on the basis “of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.”

In spite of the lengthy legal history of America restricting immigration based on national origin, judges have taken the initiative to make their own interpretation of migration policy. No matter how many times the Trump administration revises the executive order to prove it is not a Muslim ban, the courts still find it too discriminatory to take effect.

By declaring that the government cannot restrict immigration based on national origin, judges are declaring any attempt to limit migration is inherently racist. This thinking operates under the delusion that there is some hidden open borders clause in the Constitution.

We must take in any and all newcomers to the country because the Statue of Liberty poem says so. It doesn’t matter whether they come here legally or illegally, we must unquestionably welcome these immigrants or we are no longer America.

Many Americans find this argument ridiculous, as a large percentage of our country supports immigration reduction. But courts don’t have to answer to the people, and judges have used their power to impose their own will on immigration policy.

From the leniency shown to illegal alien criminals to preventing the president from enforcing immigration law, America’s legal system is proving it cannot be trusted to side with the interests of the nation’s citizens.

Fortunately, Trump is reshaping the federal judiciary with conservative picks and one hopes thatrestores sanity to the courts soon.

Until then, try not to be killed by an illegal immigrant, especially in a sanctuary city. A jury may find it’s more important to send a message to the president than find justice for your murder.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

They Call Her “Pocahontas” But “Dances with Lies” Would Be More Accurate

“We have a representative in Congress who has been here a long time … longer than you — they call her Pocahontas!” ~ Donald Trump

Elizabeth Warren on Trump comment: “I just couldn’t believe it!!!”

“President Trump couldn’t even make it through a ceremony to honor these men without throwing in a racial slur,” Warren told Cooper on “Anderson Cooper 360.

How can this be a racial slur by Trump when everyone DOES call Elizabeth Warren “Pocahontas”?

In fact Elizabeth Warren even calls herself “Pocahontas”.

She even named her website

Check it out.

Think about it.  A representative in Congress is called Pocahontas.  This representative in Congress calls herself Pocahontas.  The president stated this fact.  But he is a racist?

The deeper you look, the more you will find the real racist.

Elizabeth Warren changed her race from white to Native American in order to climb the totem pole of success (pun intended) using affirmative action.  She got busted so now she merely “identifies” as Native American.  You can’t get much more “racist” than that.

“Elizabeth Warren made up her heritage, which I think is racist. I think she’s a racist, actually, because what she did was very racist.” ~ Donald Trump

All true.

Elizabeth Warren claimed to have Cherokee blood in order to reap career “diversity” benefits by claiming to be “part”  Cherokee.

The blue eyed, pale skinned, whitest minority in the history of academia was described in glowing multicultural terms in an article in the Fordham Law Review. The article calls her Harvard Law School’s “first woman of color.”

Elizabeth Warren, for years, presented herself as a Native American. It was a lie, plain and simple. In a professional environment where laying claim to minority status generates tremendous professional currency — influencing hiring and promotion decisions and the granting of tenure — she perpetuated this lie and profited from it.

Last year, Warren taught only one class at Harvard Law, yet she enjoys an annual salary of $350,000 — this is in addition to nearly $200,000 in royalties and consulting fees she earned while taking a leave from her academic job to help found president Obama’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Warren had first claimed minority status in the 1980s in a law application used for recruiting.

Her birth certificate and every document from 1949 to 1980 listed her as “white”.

When it was discovered that Elizabeth Warren had no ancestors that were Cherokee or any other Native American, Warren claimed that her Cherokee blood supposedly comes from her grandfather Crawford.

OK. But then it was quickly discovered that John Crawford was her great-grandparent. That would make her 1/32 Cherokee. If it were true.

When asked why she described herself as a true Native American with only 1/32 Cherokee, she responded that she listed herself that way to meet other like-minded
Native Americans.

The Harvard Law professor and Massachusetts Senator now admits that she also told Harvard she was Native American. But then she said she didn’t know how she came to be listed as Native American on the university’s federal diversity filings. Furthermore, she continues to insist that race played no role in her recruitment, even though the former Harvard dean who recruited her says claims to minority status was a big factor when he hired her.

Harvard also took full advantage of Warren’s lie, bragging to The Harvard Crimson about her minority status during one of the near-constant student protests over insufficient “diversity” in the faculty.

Warren also listed herself as an Indian in law school faculty directories and, just last month, said, “I am very proud of my Native American heritage.”

Prior to being hired by Harvard, Warren had also listed herself as a minority at the University of Pennsylvania.

But the 1/32 Cherokee claim is not even true. Warren claims that her 1/32 Cherokee blood supposedly comes from her maternal (great) grandfather Crawford. But Jacobson points out that real Cherokee genealogist Twila Barnes unearthed a newspaper clipping from the Muskogee Times Democrat of August 17, 1906, which referred to Warren’s great grandfather John H. Crawford as “a white man.” Not only was John H. Crawford white instead of Cherokee, he shot and wounded a Cherokee!

Amazingly, Warren and her campaign seem to be doubling down on her claims to minority status, claims which New York Post and other publications have thoroughly debunked.

The Boston Globe immediately jumped to Warren’s defense, quoting a genealogist who found a marriage license on which Warren’s great-great-uncle scribbled that his mother, Warren’s great-great-great grandmother, was a Cherokee. Now it is the great great grandmother? This is not part of the official marriage license. If I scribble “Kenyan” on Obama’s birth certificate, does that make it true? But when pressed for the marriage license or any details about it, the genealogist folded.

And the genealogist who debunked the claim of Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Cherokee Indian heritage is fighting mad that the senator repeats the claim in her new book called “A Fighting Chance.”

The Cherokee genealogist, Twila Barnes, who systematically revealed in 2012 during Warren’s campaign that not only was Warren’s great-grandfather not a Cherokee but was rather a white man who boasted of shooting one, is reportedly eager to meet the senator on her book tour, along with members of the Cherokee nation who are none too pleased with the continued charade.

When Barnes and other Cherokee women flew to Boston to try to meet with Warren to present the genealogical evidence that Warren was not actually Cherokee, Warren refused to see them. When they tried to catch up with her in a hotel lobby, Warren ran, very fast, giving true meaning to her campaign song: Run Liz run. You gotta run run run!

But it may not be so easy dodging the women on a book tour.

According to William A. Jacobson, a blogger at, now that Warren is traveling the country on her book tour, Barnes finally wants to meet Warren at one of the tour stops, and will try to arrange a group of Cherokee women to attend one of the book signings.

“She could have used her new book to acknowledge the truth and apologize for her blatant disrespect of minorities, but instead, she’s continued to perpetuate the lie and attempted to portray herself as a victim,” write Barnes on her blog.

Soon the preponderance of the evidence suggested she wasn’t even 1/32 Cherokee from her great great grandmother, and the census records for 1860 list the allegedly Cherokee great-great-great-grandmother, O.C. Sarah Smith Crawford, as “white.” Also, Warren’s family isn’t listed in the Cherokee registry. Unlike Democrat voter rolls, to be on the Cherokee list, some proof is required.

So now, with 3 lies under her belt, we’re down to Warren taking another stab at it. Warren is now reminiscence that her great-aunt used to point to a portrait of her great-great-grandfather noting his high cheekbones. No Joke.

Family lore is not proof. Proof is contemporary documentation, produced under penalty of perjury, such as a census record. My mother told me she found me under a rock, but I don’t put that on job applications.

Some of the universities that employed Warren rushed to claim that her fake Indian ancestry had nothing to do with it. They speak with forked tongue, causing heap-um laughter. Harvard was so desperate for diversity, it made a half-black, amateur, part-time student president of the Harvard Law Review!

To grasp what a sin against political correctness this is, consider the ridiculous debates about blackness regularly engaged in at our universities. About the time Dances With Lies was getting a job with Harvard as a fake Indian — valued for her fake hunting and tracking skills — a debate broke out at Northwestern University law school about whether a potential faculty hire was black enough.

One professor wrote a heated three-page letter to the hiring committee complaining that the recruit “should not be considered a black candidate,” explaining, “not all with dark skins are black,” nor should they be considered “black in the U.S. context.” (Obama?)

Warren has defended herself, claiming she did it only so she would be invited to powwows, or what the great white father calls “meetings,” saying she hoped “I would be invited to a luncheon, a group something that might happen with people who are like I am.”

What on earth does “people who are like I am” mean? Let’s invite Elizabeth because she is 1/32nd Cherokee. We really need the 1/32nd Cherokee perspective around here. Maybe she has some old recipes that are 1/32nd Cherokee!

During her last campaign, the Warren campaign claimed it was sexist to question Warren about her bald-faced lie: “Once again, the qualifications and ability of a woman are being called into question by Scott Brown … It’s outrageous.”

First, truth is not restricted by gender.

Second, Scott Brown barely mentioned Warren’s stinking lie.

Third, the only people who consider it a “qualification” to be 1/32nd Cherokee are university hiring committees, not the real world.

Now it’s beginning to look like her ancestors not only did not suffer, but caused the suffering she’s getting the benefit of. The great-great-great-grandfather married
to the not-Cherokee O.C. Sarah Smith Crawford turns out to have been one of the white enforcers on the brutal Trail of Tears, helping round up Indians from their
homes in order to march them to a less desirable part of the country.

Fauxahontas should stay home and smokem peace pipe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“The Cover-Up Begins To End”: Judicial Watch Exposes Explosive New Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Docs

Another crime of the century barely mentioned in the state run media. It appears that the corrupt FBI and the corrupt DOJ are involved in another massive coverup.

Back on June 29, 2016, Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, tried to convince us that the following ‘impromptu’ meeting between herself and Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport, a private meeting which lasted 30 minutes on Lynch’s private plane, was mostly a “social meeting” in which Bill talked about his grandchildren and golf game. It was not, under any circumstances, related to the statement that former FBI Director James Comey made just 6 days later clearing Hillary Clinton of any alleged crimes related to his agency’s investigation.

Not surprisingly, following the above media clip several concerned watchdog groups filed FOIA requests seeking any and all DOJ and/or FBI documents related to what was either (i) a really poorly timed meeting, in the best case, or (ii) a clear attempt by a former President of the United States to apply leverage over the current Attorney General to obstruct justice and get his wife elected President, in the worst case.

After originally being told by the FBI there were no documents to produce in response to their July 2016 FOIA request, Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton was subsequently told in October 2017 that the FBI had simply overlooked 30 pages worth of relevant docs…30 pages which Fitton now says will mark the “beginning of the end” of the DOJ’s “cover-up” when they’re released this Thursday.

FBI Hid Clinton/Lynch Tarmac Meeting Records. But the cover-up begins to end — thanks to @JudicialWatch — the day after tomorrow. @RealDonaldTrump needs to clean house at FBI/DOJ.
YouTube ‎@YouTube

Tom Fitton

FBI Hid Clinton/Lynch Tarmac Meeting Records. But the cover-up begins to end — thanks to @JudicialWatch — the day after tomorrow. @RealDonaldTrump needs to clean house at FBI/DOJ.
1:51 PM – Nov 28, 2017
99 99 Replies 2,124 2,124 Retweets 3,028 3,028 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Of course, Fitton expressed his frustration with the botched FOIA response back in October after describing the FBI as “out of control” and saying it’s “stunning that the FBI ‘found’ these Clinton-Lynch tarmac records only after we caught the agency hiding them in another lawsuit.” Per Judicial Watch:

“The FBI is out of control. It is stunning that the FBI ‘found’ these Clinton-Lynch tarmac records only after we caught the agency hiding them in another lawsuit,” stated Judicial Watch Tom Fitton. “Judicial Watch will continue to press for answers about the FBI’s document games in court. In the meantime, the FBI should stop the stonewall and release these new records immediately.”

This case has also forced the FBI to release to the public the FBI’s Clinton investigative file, although more than half of the records remain withheld. The FBI has also told Judicial Watch that it anticipates completing the processing of these materials by July 2018.

There is significant controversy about whether the FBI and Obama Justice Department investigation gave Clinton and other witnesses and potential targets preferential treatment.

So what say you? Will Judicial Watch finally manage to release documents that expose collusion between a former U.S. President, the FBI and the sitting Attorney General to cover-up a massive Clinton scandal or will they simply release more heavily redacted documents that tell us precisely nothing. Will the Clintons and their cronies ever get the justice they deserve?

Justice “tomorrow, tomorrow”. It’s always tomorrow, or next week, or next year.

We’ll let you know on Thursday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment